Effective Well Rate Management Using a Streamline-Based Model in Belridge Diatomite Waterflood

Marilou Tanchuling Guerrero-Lee, Diego Manfre, M. Thiele
{"title":"Effective Well Rate Management Using a Streamline-Based Model in Belridge Diatomite Waterflood","authors":"Marilou Tanchuling Guerrero-Lee, Diego Manfre, M. Thiele","doi":"10.2118/209281-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n In the early 1980's, waterflooding began in Belridge Diatomite (BD), a thick, highly porous, and tight reservoir in California. Over the years, differing injection strategies lead to mixed results. Today, there are approximately 1,900+ injectors and 2,600+ producers in the Belridge Diatomite Waterflood (BDWF) and setting injection and production well rate targets to improve recovery is extremely challenging. Multiple teams using different methods for estimating rate targets in different parts of the field adds complexity to the overall field management strategy. The main objective of this work was to simplify field management by using a quantitative, streamline-based method to establish and quantify injector-producer relationships, reduce human bias, while improving the efficiency and flood performance in the West Grande (WG) area of the BDWF subject to key surface and subsurface constraints.\n The pilot test targeted 52 injection strings and 142 producers in Southern WG with an approximate total water injection rate of 10,500 STB/Day and total water and oil production rates of 8,200 STB/D and 700 STB/D, respectively. An important and novel aspect of the work presented here involves constraining the injection well rate targets to surface elevation, injection string communication, 30-day average wellhead pressure, subsurface impairments, and surface injection capacity. On the production side, the constraints were surface elevation, pump runtime, and operational status. This work describes setting well rate targets using a streamline-based workflow while honoring minimum and maximum rates as deduced from the constraints above.\n Injection and production rates in the WG pilot area were changed four times over nine months in the period May 2020-January 2021. Not withstanding uncertainties in production and watercut measurements and interference due to operational activities, the injection and production rate changes resulted in a reversal of the oil decline observed in the previous year. The improvement in the oil decline honored all key constraints and did not cause WG to experience changes to surface elevation, an important requirement in reservoir management of the highly compressible Diatomite reservoir.\n Using streamlines to define well patterns based on historical production/injection rates, and considering all patterns simultaneously is a major departure from the one-at-a-time fixed pattern and reservoir team-specific strategy used in the past. Considering that the manual pattern-by-pattern review consumed well over 50% of the time spent by teams trying to improve flood performance, the approach described in the work also represents a significant improvement in productivity and a more agile reservoir management strategy. The ability to include key surface and subsurface constraints in the calculation of well target rates is a novel addition to streamline-based surveillance modeling and a key contribution of this work.\n","PeriodicalId":224766,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, April 27, 2022","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, April 27, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/209281-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the early 1980's, waterflooding began in Belridge Diatomite (BD), a thick, highly porous, and tight reservoir in California. Over the years, differing injection strategies lead to mixed results. Today, there are approximately 1,900+ injectors and 2,600+ producers in the Belridge Diatomite Waterflood (BDWF) and setting injection and production well rate targets to improve recovery is extremely challenging. Multiple teams using different methods for estimating rate targets in different parts of the field adds complexity to the overall field management strategy. The main objective of this work was to simplify field management by using a quantitative, streamline-based method to establish and quantify injector-producer relationships, reduce human bias, while improving the efficiency and flood performance in the West Grande (WG) area of the BDWF subject to key surface and subsurface constraints. The pilot test targeted 52 injection strings and 142 producers in Southern WG with an approximate total water injection rate of 10,500 STB/Day and total water and oil production rates of 8,200 STB/D and 700 STB/D, respectively. An important and novel aspect of the work presented here involves constraining the injection well rate targets to surface elevation, injection string communication, 30-day average wellhead pressure, subsurface impairments, and surface injection capacity. On the production side, the constraints were surface elevation, pump runtime, and operational status. This work describes setting well rate targets using a streamline-based workflow while honoring minimum and maximum rates as deduced from the constraints above. Injection and production rates in the WG pilot area were changed four times over nine months in the period May 2020-January 2021. Not withstanding uncertainties in production and watercut measurements and interference due to operational activities, the injection and production rate changes resulted in a reversal of the oil decline observed in the previous year. The improvement in the oil decline honored all key constraints and did not cause WG to experience changes to surface elevation, an important requirement in reservoir management of the highly compressible Diatomite reservoir. Using streamlines to define well patterns based on historical production/injection rates, and considering all patterns simultaneously is a major departure from the one-at-a-time fixed pattern and reservoir team-specific strategy used in the past. Considering that the manual pattern-by-pattern review consumed well over 50% of the time spent by teams trying to improve flood performance, the approach described in the work also represents a significant improvement in productivity and a more agile reservoir management strategy. The ability to include key surface and subsurface constraints in the calculation of well target rates is a novel addition to streamline-based surveillance modeling and a key contribution of this work.
基于流线模型的Belridge硅藻土注水有效井速管理
在20世纪80年代早期,加州的Belridge硅藻土(BD)是一种厚的、高孔隙的致密储层,开始进行水驱。多年来,不同的注射策略导致了不同的结果。目前,在Belridge硅藻土水驱(BDWF)地区,大约有1900多个注水井和2600多个生产井,设定注水井和生产井的速度目标以提高采收率是极具挑战性的。多个团队使用不同的方法来估算油田不同部分的产量目标,这增加了整个油田管理策略的复杂性。这项工作的主要目标是通过使用定量的、基于流线的方法来建立和量化注入者与采油者之间的关系,从而简化现场管理,减少人为偏差,同时提高BDWF West Grande (WG)区域的效率和洪水性能,这些区域受到关键的地面和地下限制。该先导试验针对WG南部地区的52个注入管柱和142家生产商,总注水量约为10500 STB/D,总产水量和产油量分别为8200 STB/D和700 STB/D。本文提出的一项重要且新颖的工作涉及将注入井速率目标限制在地面高度、注入管柱连通性、30天平均井口压力、地下损害和地面注入能力。在生产方面,限制因素包括地面高度、泵的运行时间和运行状态。该工作描述了使用基于流线型的工作流程设置井速目标,同时根据上述约束条件推导出最小和最大速率。从2020年5月到2021年1月,WG试验区的注入和生产速度在9个月内改变了4次。尽管存在生产和含水测量的不确定性以及作业活动的干扰,但注入和生产速度的变化逆转了前一年观察到的产油量下降趋势。油差的改善满足了所有关键约束条件,并且没有导致WG经历地表标高的变化,而地表标高是高可压缩性硅藻土油藏管理的重要要求。利用流线根据历史生产/注入速度来定义井网,并同时考虑所有井网,这与过去使用的一次固定模式和针对油藏团队的策略有很大不同。考虑到手动模式对模式的审查消耗了团队试图改善洪水性能所花费的时间的50%以上,工作中描述的方法也代表了生产力的显著提高和更灵活的水库管理策略。在计算井目标速率时,能够将关键的地面和地下限制因素包括在内,这是基于流线的监测模型的一个新补充,也是该工作的一个关键贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信