Features of Unmanned Aircraft Detection Using Precision Approach Radar

E. Rubtsov, A. Fedorov, N. Povarenkin, M. AL-Rubaye
{"title":"Features of Unmanned Aircraft Detection Using Precision Approach Radar","authors":"E. Rubtsov, A. Fedorov, N. Povarenkin, M. AL-Rubaye","doi":"10.32603/1993-8985-2022-25-3-51-61","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The increasing number of incidents involving unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) makes their detection in the aerodrome area an important task, which can be solved by specialized surveillance means. However, the application of such means requires certification procedures confirming the effectiveness and safety of their use. Therefore, in the short term, it seems reasonable to use standard technologies. In the approach sector, this task can be solved by precision approach radar systems. The small radar cross-section (RCS) of UAVs leads to a decrease in the maximum range and the appearance of blind spots, within which the vehicle cannot be detected.Aim. Analysis of the possibility of detecting UAVs using a precision approach radar, assessing the maximum detection range, blind spots and developing recommendations for their reduction.Materials and methods. An analytical method was used for determining the maximum detection range for a precision approach radar, taking into account UAV characteristics. A method for estimating the detection range of a low-flying target, taking into account the influence of the underlying surface, was also used.Results. Using the example of the precision approach radar RP-5G, the maximum detection ranges were determined, which amounted to 380, 2730, 4480 and 14350 m for UAVs with an RCS of 0.01, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.5 m2, respectively. The length of the blind spots of the RP-5G was 4620, 2270, 1019 m for UAVs with an RCS of 0.01, 0.05, 0.1 m2, respectively. Under the vehicle RCS of 0.5 m2 and greater, no blind spots are observed.Conclusion. Analytical expressions for calculating the maximum detection range and blind spots were obtained. The results can be used when assessing specific features of UAV observation in the aerodrome area (landing sector). Standard precision approach radar systems can be used when surveying UAVs with an RCS greater than 0.5 m2. For UAVs with an RCS of 0.1...0.5 m2, modernized precision approach radar systems with an increased probing pulse energy should be implemented.","PeriodicalId":217555,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Russian Universities. Radioelectronics","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Russian Universities. Radioelectronics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32603/1993-8985-2022-25-3-51-61","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. The increasing number of incidents involving unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) makes their detection in the aerodrome area an important task, which can be solved by specialized surveillance means. However, the application of such means requires certification procedures confirming the effectiveness and safety of their use. Therefore, in the short term, it seems reasonable to use standard technologies. In the approach sector, this task can be solved by precision approach radar systems. The small radar cross-section (RCS) of UAVs leads to a decrease in the maximum range and the appearance of blind spots, within which the vehicle cannot be detected.Aim. Analysis of the possibility of detecting UAVs using a precision approach radar, assessing the maximum detection range, blind spots and developing recommendations for their reduction.Materials and methods. An analytical method was used for determining the maximum detection range for a precision approach radar, taking into account UAV characteristics. A method for estimating the detection range of a low-flying target, taking into account the influence of the underlying surface, was also used.Results. Using the example of the precision approach radar RP-5G, the maximum detection ranges were determined, which amounted to 380, 2730, 4480 and 14350 m for UAVs with an RCS of 0.01, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.5 m2, respectively. The length of the blind spots of the RP-5G was 4620, 2270, 1019 m for UAVs with an RCS of 0.01, 0.05, 0.1 m2, respectively. Under the vehicle RCS of 0.5 m2 and greater, no blind spots are observed.Conclusion. Analytical expressions for calculating the maximum detection range and blind spots were obtained. The results can be used when assessing specific features of UAV observation in the aerodrome area (landing sector). Standard precision approach radar systems can be used when surveying UAVs with an RCS greater than 0.5 m2. For UAVs with an RCS of 0.1...0.5 m2, modernized precision approach radar systems with an increased probing pulse energy should be implemented.
利用精密进近雷达探测无人机的特点
介绍。近年来,涉及无人机的事件越来越多,对无人机的检测成为机场区域的一项重要任务,这一问题可以通过专门的监视手段来解决。但是,采用这种手段需要核证程序,以确认其使用的有效性和安全性。因此,在短期内,使用标准技术似乎是合理的。在进近领域,这一任务可以通过精密进近雷达系统来解决。无人机的雷达截面积小,导致最大射程减小和盲点的出现,在盲点内飞行器无法被探测到。分析使用精确接近雷达探测无人机的可能性,评估最大探测距离和盲点,并提出减少盲点的建议。材料和方法。在考虑无人机特性的情况下,采用一种解析法确定了精密进场雷达的最大探测距离。提出了一种考虑下垫面影响的低空目标探测距离估计方法。以RP-5G精密接近雷达为例,确定了RCS为0.01、0.05、0.1和0.5 m2时,无人机的最大探测距离分别为380、2730、4480和14350 m。RCS分别为0.01、0.05、0.1 m2时,RP-5G无人机的盲点长度分别为4620、2270、1019 m。在车辆RCS为0.5 m2及以上时,未观察到盲点。得到了计算最大探测距离和盲点的解析表达式。该结果可用于评估无人机在机场区域(着陆扇区)观测的具体特征。当测量RCS大于0.5 m2的无人机时,可以使用标准精密接近雷达系统。对于RCS为0.1 ~ 0.5 m2的无人机,应采用提高探测脉冲能量的现代化精密进近雷达系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信