Constructing the Daoistic Theory of Toleration from Zhuangzi

J. Park
{"title":"Constructing the Daoistic Theory of Toleration from Zhuangzi","authors":"J. Park","doi":"10.54913/hn.2023.4.1.71","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Toleration presupposes denial towards a object of toleration. However, toleration is not limited to a mere act of denial. Toleration, while maintaining the act of denial, adds an additional denial of any form of realization of the initial act of denial towards the object of toleration. The peculiarity of the act of toleration lies in the simultaneous practice of these two forms of denials. In other words, the the first form of denial, in the sense that you cannot accept the behavior or ideology of the object of toleration as your own, and the second form of denial, the denial toward the realization of the initial denial, compose the act of toleration. The purpose of this study is to trace the denials of these two forms, which the author argues as an element representing the specificity of toleration, in Zhuangzi's work 『莊子』. To this end, the author examines four stories in 『莊子』 as examples. Through this, the author concludes that in 『莊子』, there are ample evidences showing the Daiosm in 『莊子』 should be regarded as a philosophical system qualifying itself as a tolerant. In addition, the author suggests to use the method of tracking the presence of specific elements of toleration within a specific theoretical system as a primary means of identifying whether a specific theory is tolerant.","PeriodicalId":337904,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Society of Human and Nature","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean Society of Human and Nature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54913/hn.2023.4.1.71","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Toleration presupposes denial towards a object of toleration. However, toleration is not limited to a mere act of denial. Toleration, while maintaining the act of denial, adds an additional denial of any form of realization of the initial act of denial towards the object of toleration. The peculiarity of the act of toleration lies in the simultaneous practice of these two forms of denials. In other words, the the first form of denial, in the sense that you cannot accept the behavior or ideology of the object of toleration as your own, and the second form of denial, the denial toward the realization of the initial denial, compose the act of toleration. The purpose of this study is to trace the denials of these two forms, which the author argues as an element representing the specificity of toleration, in Zhuangzi's work 『莊子』. To this end, the author examines four stories in 『莊子』 as examples. Through this, the author concludes that in 『莊子』, there are ample evidences showing the Daiosm in 『莊子』 should be regarded as a philosophical system qualifying itself as a tolerant. In addition, the author suggests to use the method of tracking the presence of specific elements of toleration within a specific theoretical system as a primary means of identifying whether a specific theory is tolerant.
从庄子看道家的宽容观
宽容以否定宽容的对象为前提。然而,宽容并不仅仅局限于拒绝的行为。宽容,在保持否定行为的同时,对最初否定行为的任何形式的实现,对宽容的对象,又增加了一种额外的否定。宽容行为的特点在于同时实践这两种形式的否认。换句话说,第一种形式的否认,即你不能接受宽容对象的行为或意识形态,第二种形式的否认,即对实现最初否认的否认,构成了宽容的行为。本研究的目的是追溯这两种形式的否认,作者认为这是庄子作品《外传》中代表宽容特异性的元素。为此,作者以《外传》中的四个故事为例。由此,作者得出结论:在《天涯》中,有充分的证据表明,《天涯》中的岱教应该被视为一种具有宽容性质的哲学体系。此外,作者建议采用追踪某一特定理论体系中是否存在特定宽容要素的方法,作为确定某一特定理论是否宽容的主要手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信