Development and Evaluation of Simulation Education for University of Minnesota Master of Medical Device Innovation Students in a Post-COVID World

Courtney Backstrom, Abhishek Chandra, Joseph Hale, Dan Mooradian
{"title":"Development and Evaluation of Simulation Education for University of Minnesota Master of Medical Device Innovation Students in a Post-COVID World","authors":"Courtney Backstrom, Abhishek Chandra, Joseph Hale, Dan Mooradian","doi":"10.1115/dmd2022-1066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The COVID-19 pandemic has fundamentally altered the pedagogical approach to education at every level of training, including at the undergraduate level and graduate or professional level. These unprecedented times have tested academic resilience, agility, creativity, and adaptability in all aspects, including inventive alternative teaching methods. With an increasing reliance on virtual instruction, self-directed learning, and hybrid models of instruction, certain approaches of hands-on training, practice-based learning, and evaluation have had to evolve.\n The University of Minnesota’s Master of Medical Device Innovation students are typically immersed in clinical environments through physician shadowing in the operating room, evaluating unmet needs and untapped areas of potential innovation. Engineers who can immerse themselves in surgical education, shadowing, and frontline medical experience can better appreciate, recognize, and enhance current medical technologies and processes. With the OR case restrictions in the era of COVID-19, these learners were faced with limited clinical exposure and thus limited familiarity with the dynamics and processes of clinical practice. As such not only education, but the functioning of the entire industry is stunted. From an instructive perspective, this creates a challenge for students attempting to generate relevant and feasible practicum ideas, accurate prototypes, and offers fewer opportunities to develop these ideas alongside the experts and medical professionals - the target audience.\n Simulation education provides a means for students to engage with clinical practice in a meaningful way that bridges the gap between clinical exposure and virtual learning. A hands-on approach in which students were able to practice fundamental surgical skills of suturing, knot-tying, and the basics of laparoscopy.\n Learners were offered three didactic workshop sessions that introduced these skills and then were given opportunities to perform with supervision from expert educators. Low-cost, low-fidelity models of pertinent anatomy and physiology provided students an immersive experience that allowed them to develop a deeper understanding of interventional skills. Three two hour-long sessions of guided skills practice on low-cost simulators were attended by the 2022 Masters of Medical Device Innovation cohort and subjective measures of their understanding of the fundamental concepts were evaluated.\n High-level findings of these workshops suggest that simulation education is an effective tool in advancing the baseline understanding of surgical principles as opposed to virtual instruction and may offer some further benefit, not possible even through clinical shadowing itself.","PeriodicalId":236105,"journal":{"name":"2022 Design of Medical Devices Conference","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 Design of Medical Devices Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/dmd2022-1066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has fundamentally altered the pedagogical approach to education at every level of training, including at the undergraduate level and graduate or professional level. These unprecedented times have tested academic resilience, agility, creativity, and adaptability in all aspects, including inventive alternative teaching methods. With an increasing reliance on virtual instruction, self-directed learning, and hybrid models of instruction, certain approaches of hands-on training, practice-based learning, and evaluation have had to evolve. The University of Minnesota’s Master of Medical Device Innovation students are typically immersed in clinical environments through physician shadowing in the operating room, evaluating unmet needs and untapped areas of potential innovation. Engineers who can immerse themselves in surgical education, shadowing, and frontline medical experience can better appreciate, recognize, and enhance current medical technologies and processes. With the OR case restrictions in the era of COVID-19, these learners were faced with limited clinical exposure and thus limited familiarity with the dynamics and processes of clinical practice. As such not only education, but the functioning of the entire industry is stunted. From an instructive perspective, this creates a challenge for students attempting to generate relevant and feasible practicum ideas, accurate prototypes, and offers fewer opportunities to develop these ideas alongside the experts and medical professionals - the target audience. Simulation education provides a means for students to engage with clinical practice in a meaningful way that bridges the gap between clinical exposure and virtual learning. A hands-on approach in which students were able to practice fundamental surgical skills of suturing, knot-tying, and the basics of laparoscopy. Learners were offered three didactic workshop sessions that introduced these skills and then were given opportunities to perform with supervision from expert educators. Low-cost, low-fidelity models of pertinent anatomy and physiology provided students an immersive experience that allowed them to develop a deeper understanding of interventional skills. Three two hour-long sessions of guided skills practice on low-cost simulators were attended by the 2022 Masters of Medical Device Innovation cohort and subjective measures of their understanding of the fundamental concepts were evaluated. High-level findings of these workshops suggest that simulation education is an effective tool in advancing the baseline understanding of surgical principles as opposed to virtual instruction and may offer some further benefit, not possible even through clinical shadowing itself.
后疫情时代明尼苏达大学医疗器械创新硕士学生模拟教育的发展与评价
2019冠状病毒病大流行从根本上改变了各级培训的教学方法,包括本科和研究生或专业水平。这些前所未有的时代在各个方面都考验了学术的弹性、敏捷性、创造力和适应性,包括创造性的替代教学方法。随着对虚拟教学、自主学习和混合教学模式的日益依赖,实践培训、基于实践的学习和评估的某些方法必须发展。明尼苏达大学医疗器械创新硕士的学生通常通过医生在手术室的跟踪,沉浸在临床环境中,评估未满足的需求和未开发的潜在创新领域。能够沉浸在外科教育、实习和一线医疗经验中的工程师可以更好地欣赏、识别和提高当前的医疗技术和流程。由于新冠肺炎时代的手术室病例限制,这些学习者面临的临床接触有限,因此对临床实践的动态和过程的熟悉程度有限。因此,不仅是教育,整个行业的运作都受到了阻碍。从有益的角度来看,这给试图产生相关和可行的实习想法,准确的原型的学生带来了挑战,并且提供了更少的机会与专家和医疗专业人员-目标受众一起发展这些想法。模拟教育为学生提供了一种以有意义的方式参与临床实践的手段,弥合了临床接触和虚拟学习之间的差距。通过动手操作的方法,学生能够练习缝合、打结和腹腔镜基本手术技巧。学习者被提供了三个介绍这些技能的教学研讨会,然后有机会在专家教育工作者的监督下表演。低成本、低保真度的相关解剖学和生理学模型为学生提供了身临其境的体验,使他们能够更深入地了解介入技能。对2022年医疗器械创新硕士队列进行了三次为期两小时的低成本模拟器指导技能练习,并对他们对基本概念的理解进行了主观评估。这些研讨会的高水平研究结果表明,与虚拟教学相比,模拟教育是一种有效的工具,可以促进对外科原理的基本理解,并可能提供一些甚至通过临床实习本身也无法实现的进一步好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信