The study of models and the understanding of reality

Juan Carlos Cardona Gómez
{"title":"The study of models and the understanding of reality","authors":"Juan Carlos Cardona Gómez","doi":"10.18359/rfcb.6495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"If we consider modeling as an abstraction from reality that help us to understand and work with it, then mathematical modeling is so ancient that cannot accurately state a specific date on which such practice began. According to Schichl [1], the use of numbers to refer to bones, which can be considered as a mathematical representation of something real, dates from years before the Christian age. Actually, every culture has developed some sort of mathematical knowledge to account for daily life problems, because mathematics is at the base of all human relationships with the natural world and the social construction that allows us to live in community. Examples of this are the optimal use of available space -that requires at least an intuitive understanding of geometry and can be as complex as the most sophisticated architecture-, the distribution of resources such as food, land or materials, the distribution of time and the recording of history through the calendar, and the management of social interactions through the established rules of the market. For natural scientist, the language of mathematics has been crucial to develop useful models for specific problems and, from the study of those models, the creation (or development) of theories. Physicists, for instance, understand the word through models and theories that are supported on the mathematical relation among the measurable quantities related with the studied phenomena. This mathematical rule aim to predict future behaviors of the described system under the right conditions. When new data is found that may compromise the validity of previous models and theories, it is required to build a working explanation inside the accepted models or theories that can account for such data. If such explanation cannot be reached, some sort of change is made on the models so that the new model or theory is enriched with the currently available information. That way, a new and more solid way to understand natural reality emerges. The new model can be explored to find new predictions, new insights about the reality it represents. It is noticeable that the world has not suffer any changes, but the model we use to understand it does. Many scientists believe that a model is a simplified version of something real. Under this perspective, the model is just a representation of reality, not reality itself. Under the process of refinement that models are constantly subjected to, a better model that delivers a more accurate representation of reality is found. The mathematical rules in the model can be understood as a manifestation of the presence of mathematics inside reality, so when a more comprehensive mathematical representation of the world is found, a better understanding of nature is achieved. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18359/rfcb.5835","PeriodicalId":106330,"journal":{"name":"Revista Facultad de Ciencias Básicas","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Facultad de Ciencias Básicas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18359/rfcb.6495","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

If we consider modeling as an abstraction from reality that help us to understand and work with it, then mathematical modeling is so ancient that cannot accurately state a specific date on which such practice began. According to Schichl [1], the use of numbers to refer to bones, which can be considered as a mathematical representation of something real, dates from years before the Christian age. Actually, every culture has developed some sort of mathematical knowledge to account for daily life problems, because mathematics is at the base of all human relationships with the natural world and the social construction that allows us to live in community. Examples of this are the optimal use of available space -that requires at least an intuitive understanding of geometry and can be as complex as the most sophisticated architecture-, the distribution of resources such as food, land or materials, the distribution of time and the recording of history through the calendar, and the management of social interactions through the established rules of the market. For natural scientist, the language of mathematics has been crucial to develop useful models for specific problems and, from the study of those models, the creation (or development) of theories. Physicists, for instance, understand the word through models and theories that are supported on the mathematical relation among the measurable quantities related with the studied phenomena. This mathematical rule aim to predict future behaviors of the described system under the right conditions. When new data is found that may compromise the validity of previous models and theories, it is required to build a working explanation inside the accepted models or theories that can account for such data. If such explanation cannot be reached, some sort of change is made on the models so that the new model or theory is enriched with the currently available information. That way, a new and more solid way to understand natural reality emerges. The new model can be explored to find new predictions, new insights about the reality it represents. It is noticeable that the world has not suffer any changes, but the model we use to understand it does. Many scientists believe that a model is a simplified version of something real. Under this perspective, the model is just a representation of reality, not reality itself. Under the process of refinement that models are constantly subjected to, a better model that delivers a more accurate representation of reality is found. The mathematical rules in the model can be understood as a manifestation of the presence of mathematics inside reality, so when a more comprehensive mathematical representation of the world is found, a better understanding of nature is achieved. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18359/rfcb.5835
对模型的研究和对现实的理解
如果我们认为建模是一种从现实中抽象出来的东西,可以帮助我们理解和处理它,那么数学建模是如此古老,以至于不能准确地说明这种实践开始的具体日期。根据Schichl[1]的说法,使用数字来指代骨头,可以被认为是真实事物的数学表示,这可以追溯到基督教时代之前的许多年。实际上,每一种文化都发展出某种数学知识来解释日常生活中的问题,因为数学是人类与自然世界关系的基础,也是让我们生活在社区中的社会结构的基础。这方面的例子包括对可用空间的最佳利用——这至少需要对几何有直观的理解,而且可能像最复杂的建筑一样复杂——资源的分配,如食物、土地或材料,时间的分配和通过日历记录历史,以及通过既定的市场规则管理社会互动。对于自然科学家来说,数学语言对于开发特定问题的有用模型至关重要,并且通过对这些模型的研究,创建(或发展)理论。例如,物理学家通过模型和理论来理解这个词,这些模型和理论是基于与所研究现象相关的可测量量之间的数学关系。该数学规则旨在预测所描述系统在适当条件下的未来行为。当发现新的数据可能会损害以前的模型和理论的有效性时,需要在可以解释这些数据的公认模型或理论中建立一个有效的解释。如果不能得到这样的解释,就对模型进行某种改变,以便用当前可用的信息丰富新的模型或理论。这样,一种新的、更可靠的理解自然现实的方法就出现了。我们可以探索这个新模型,找到新的预测,找到关于它所代表的现实的新见解。值得注意的是,世界并没有发生任何变化,但我们用来理解它的模型却发生了变化。许多科学家认为模型是真实事物的简化版本。在这个视角下,模型只是现实的表征,而不是现实本身。在模型不断被提炼的过程中,找到了一个更好的模型,能够更准确地表达现实。模型中的数学规则可以理解为数学在现实中存在的一种表现,因此,当找到一个更全面的世界的数学表示时,就实现了对自然的更好理解。DOI: https://doi.org/10.18359/rfcb.5835
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信