Near Wellbore Two-Phase Effect of a Light Oil Field

Zhaocong Zhou, A. Lamberti, A. Locci, Valerio Parasiliti, P. Prevosti, G. Tripaldi
{"title":"Near Wellbore Two-Phase Effect of a Light Oil Field","authors":"Zhaocong Zhou, A. Lamberti, A. Locci, Valerio Parasiliti, P. Prevosti, G. Tripaldi","doi":"10.2118/190772-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This work describes a case of a light oil field in Sub-Saharan Africa. Soon after the start up, the production wells showed a productivity index different from expectation. In particular, well test analysis showed different stabilizations between build-up and drawdown. Since the well is flowing with pressure below the bubble point, the impact of oil permeability reduction due to presence of free gas around the wellbore was considered as a possible explanation and was investigated.\n We applied well test analysis on synthetic data generated by numerical simulation. The analysis confirms the different stabilizations between pressure build-up and drawdown, as observed from the real field case, when the flowing bottomhole pressure is below the bubble point pressure. The different flow capacity is caused by gas saturation around the wellbore, which reduces the effective permeability to oil, hence the productivity index.\n Besides this, we experienced that a full field model with large grid size is not able to represent this phenomenon. Due to the grid size, the full field model shows less pressure drop than the radial sector model, hence different gas saturation calculation. We showed that in order to simulate the effect without impacting on simulation time, applying higher well skin instead of local grid refinement can be a way forward.","PeriodicalId":178883,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Thu, June 14, 2018","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Thu, June 14, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/190772-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This work describes a case of a light oil field in Sub-Saharan Africa. Soon after the start up, the production wells showed a productivity index different from expectation. In particular, well test analysis showed different stabilizations between build-up and drawdown. Since the well is flowing with pressure below the bubble point, the impact of oil permeability reduction due to presence of free gas around the wellbore was considered as a possible explanation and was investigated. We applied well test analysis on synthetic data generated by numerical simulation. The analysis confirms the different stabilizations between pressure build-up and drawdown, as observed from the real field case, when the flowing bottomhole pressure is below the bubble point pressure. The different flow capacity is caused by gas saturation around the wellbore, which reduces the effective permeability to oil, hence the productivity index. Besides this, we experienced that a full field model with large grid size is not able to represent this phenomenon. Due to the grid size, the full field model shows less pressure drop than the radial sector model, hence different gas saturation calculation. We showed that in order to simulate the effect without impacting on simulation time, applying higher well skin instead of local grid refinement can be a way forward.
某轻质油田近井两相效应研究
本文描述了撒哈拉以南非洲一个轻油油田的实例。投产后不久,生产井的产能指数与预期不同。特别是,试井分析显示了累积和下降之间的不同稳定。由于井筒在气泡点以下的压力下流动,因此考虑了井筒周围存在游离气体导致的油渗透率降低的影响,并对其进行了研究。对数值模拟生成的综合数据进行了试井分析。分析证实,当井底流动压力低于气泡点压力时,井底压力升高和降压之间的稳定性是不同的。不同的流动能力是由井筒周围的气体饱和引起的,这降低了对油的有效渗透率,从而降低了产能指数。除此之外,我们还经历了一个大网格尺寸的全场模型无法表示这种现象。由于网格尺寸的原因,全气田模型的压降小于径向扇形模型,因此含气饱和度计算结果不同。我们表明,为了在不影响模拟时间的情况下模拟效果,采用更高的井蒙皮而不是局部网格细化是一种可行的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信