Company Reporting: Female Board Representation and the Use of Gender-diversity Language

Michael Kiely
{"title":"Company Reporting: Female Board Representation and the Use of Gender-diversity Language","authors":"Michael Kiely","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3904102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is generally understood that women are under-represented in the boards of UK firms, with homogeneous boards increasingly perceived as being unfair. An organisation’s true gender diversity values, and the influence that women on boards have upon them, may be discernible from the language used in firms’ annual reports. This study, quantitatively examining data from fifty UK FTSE-listed firms from across ten sectors, finds that there is a moderately positive correlation between the number of women on the boards of firms and the use of gender diverse terminology in those same firms’ annual reports. This study also provides descriptive statistics on the gender composition of executive boards, including the commonly reported Blau diversity index value, and of the gender diversity language used in the sampled reports. The findings support arguments that, as more women enter the boardroom, they positively affect reporting quality, and possibly the firm and its values more widely, and that their contributions are not marginalised. However, if reporting narratives are primarily used as a stakeholder impression management tactic, then the results of this study suggest that women on boards may be complicit in such strategies.","PeriodicalId":232000,"journal":{"name":"INSEAD: Organisational Behaviour (Topic)","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INSEAD: Organisational Behaviour (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3904102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is generally understood that women are under-represented in the boards of UK firms, with homogeneous boards increasingly perceived as being unfair. An organisation’s true gender diversity values, and the influence that women on boards have upon them, may be discernible from the language used in firms’ annual reports. This study, quantitatively examining data from fifty UK FTSE-listed firms from across ten sectors, finds that there is a moderately positive correlation between the number of women on the boards of firms and the use of gender diverse terminology in those same firms’ annual reports. This study also provides descriptive statistics on the gender composition of executive boards, including the commonly reported Blau diversity index value, and of the gender diversity language used in the sampled reports. The findings support arguments that, as more women enter the boardroom, they positively affect reporting quality, and possibly the firm and its values more widely, and that their contributions are not marginalised. However, if reporting narratives are primarily used as a stakeholder impression management tactic, then the results of this study suggest that women on boards may be complicit in such strategies.
公司报告:女性董事会代表和性别多样性语言的使用
人们普遍认为,女性在英国公司董事会中的代表性不足,同质董事会越来越被认为是不公平的。一个组织真正的性别多元化价值观,以及董事会中女性对他们的影响,可以从公司年度报告中使用的语言中看出。这项研究对来自10个行业的50家英国富时上市公司的数据进行了定量分析,发现公司董事会中女性人数与这些公司年度报告中性别多样化术语的使用之间存在适度的正相关关系。本研究还提供了关于执行委员会性别组成的描述性统计数据,包括通常报告的布劳多样性指数值,以及抽样报告中使用的性别多样性语言。研究结果支持这样一种观点,即随着越来越多的女性进入董事会,她们会对报告质量产生积极影响,可能还会更广泛地影响公司及其价值观,而且她们的贡献不会被边缘化。然而,如果报告叙述主要被用作利益相关者印象管理策略,那么本研究的结果表明,董事会中的女性可能是这种策略的同谋。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信