Securing the city, making the city: Property guardianship and dispersed policing in urban space

Elara Shurety
{"title":"Securing the city, making the city: Property guardianship and dispersed policing in urban space","authors":"Elara Shurety","doi":"10.54825/jeyt2225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article addresses the phenomenon of contemporary property guardianship, a type of building security by live-in occupants, who pay below-market rents, as a growing method of dispersed policing. While the centrality of property security is often foregrounded, both in existing literature on the topic and by property guardian operators, this research charts the increasing use of property guardians as operationalised agents in the surveillance and regulation of urban space. Within this, it looks at property security through an understanding of the building as a spillover site, the security for which has ramifications for wider urban space. Through analysis of how property guardians provide security within a wider remit than typically understood, it underscores guardianships relationship to broader security regimes. In light of its findings, it readdresses the role guardianship plays within the context of urban regeneration and gentrification. Through focusing on guardianship in London, with reference to other U.K. cities, it examines closely at borough-level local authorities use of guardians to further understand the position of guardianship-as-policing within regeneration. As such, it engages with the ways that property guardianship, as with other modes of policing, is concomitant with efforts to reorganise and remake cities. This research builds on previous scholarship within the topic of guardianship, while drawing on work from fields such as urban studies, policing studies and abolitionist thought, as well as reportage, promotional material, and both local and national policy. Through use of interviews and questionnaires, this article centres the experiences of guardians, and their relationship to their duties. It attempts to understand the subjectivities produced and actively sought by such dispersed methods of policing activity, which are undoubtedly reliant partly on the precarity of those enacting them.","PeriodicalId":321208,"journal":{"name":"Radical Housing Journal","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radical Housing Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54825/jeyt2225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article addresses the phenomenon of contemporary property guardianship, a type of building security by live-in occupants, who pay below-market rents, as a growing method of dispersed policing. While the centrality of property security is often foregrounded, both in existing literature on the topic and by property guardian operators, this research charts the increasing use of property guardians as operationalised agents in the surveillance and regulation of urban space. Within this, it looks at property security through an understanding of the building as a spillover site, the security for which has ramifications for wider urban space. Through analysis of how property guardians provide security within a wider remit than typically understood, it underscores guardianships relationship to broader security regimes. In light of its findings, it readdresses the role guardianship plays within the context of urban regeneration and gentrification. Through focusing on guardianship in London, with reference to other U.K. cities, it examines closely at borough-level local authorities use of guardians to further understand the position of guardianship-as-policing within regeneration. As such, it engages with the ways that property guardianship, as with other modes of policing, is concomitant with efforts to reorganise and remake cities. This research builds on previous scholarship within the topic of guardianship, while drawing on work from fields such as urban studies, policing studies and abolitionist thought, as well as reportage, promotional material, and both local and national policy. Through use of interviews and questionnaires, this article centres the experiences of guardians, and their relationship to their duties. It attempts to understand the subjectivities produced and actively sought by such dispersed methods of policing activity, which are undoubtedly reliant partly on the precarity of those enacting them.
保卫城市,创造城市:城市空间中的财产监护与分散警务
本文讨论了当代财产监护现象,这是一种由支付低于市场租金的住客提供的建筑物安全,是一种日益增长的分散监管方法。虽然财产安全的中心地位经常被强调,无论是在现有的文献中,还是在财产监护人经营者中,本研究表明,在城市空间的监督和监管中,财产监护人作为可操作的代理人的使用越来越多。在此范围内,它通过将建筑理解为一个溢出站点来看待财产安全,其安全性对更广泛的城市空间具有影响。通过分析财产监护人如何在比通常理解的更广泛的职权范围内提供安全,它强调了监护人与更广泛的安全制度的关系。根据其研究结果,它重新定义了监护人在城市更新和中产阶级化的背景下所扮演的角色。通过关注伦敦的监护制度,参考其他英国城市,它密切关注自治市镇一级地方当局对监护人的使用,以进一步了解监护作为警务在再生中的地位。就其本身而言,它涉及到财产监护的方式,就像其他警务模式一样,是与重组和重建城市的努力相伴随的。这项研究建立在先前监护主题的学术研究基础上,同时借鉴了城市研究、警务研究、废奴主义思想、报告文学、宣传材料以及地方和国家政策等领域的工作。通过访谈和问卷调查,本文以监护人的经历为中心,以及他们与职责的关系。它试图理解这种分散的警务活动方法所产生和积极寻求的主体性,这些方法无疑部分依赖于制定这些方法的人的不稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信