Emotionalisation Strategy in the Internet News Coverage of the COVID-19 Vaccines

E. Teneva
{"title":"Emotionalisation Strategy in the Internet News Coverage of the COVID-19 Vaccines","authors":"E. Teneva","doi":"10.4108/eai.3-8-2021.2315052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study encompasses the issues of public opinion manipulation in the post-Covid era. Within the framework of the research, the author delves into the discourse analysis of the most common rhetorical devices used by journalists for implementing the emotionalisation strategy and politicizing the Covid-19 vaccines, including emotional identification with newsreaders, self-presentation as well as appeals to pseudo-authorities. The reliability of the scientific results is supported by the analysis of more than 100 news stories about the Covid-19 vaccines collected from the online versions of the British and US highlycirculated papers. The conducted study shows that emotionalisation of the news coverage of the Covid-19 vaccines is aimed at political decision-making, enhancing or discrediting the image of the vaccines and the countries, polarizing social groups and manipulating public opinion in the digital information warfare. The study promotes deeper understanding of media manipulation tools, thus helping individuals develop media literacy skills.","PeriodicalId":210740,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the First Lekantara Annual Conference on Public Administration, Literature, Social Sciences, Humanities, and Education, LePALISSHE 2021, August 3, 2021, Malang, Indonesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the First Lekantara Annual Conference on Public Administration, Literature, Social Sciences, Humanities, and Education, LePALISSHE 2021, August 3, 2021, Malang, Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.3-8-2021.2315052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The study encompasses the issues of public opinion manipulation in the post-Covid era. Within the framework of the research, the author delves into the discourse analysis of the most common rhetorical devices used by journalists for implementing the emotionalisation strategy and politicizing the Covid-19 vaccines, including emotional identification with newsreaders, self-presentation as well as appeals to pseudo-authorities. The reliability of the scientific results is supported by the analysis of more than 100 news stories about the Covid-19 vaccines collected from the online versions of the British and US highlycirculated papers. The conducted study shows that emotionalisation of the news coverage of the Covid-19 vaccines is aimed at political decision-making, enhancing or discrediting the image of the vaccines and the countries, polarizing social groups and manipulating public opinion in the digital information warfare. The study promotes deeper understanding of media manipulation tools, thus helping individuals develop media literacy skills.
COVID-19疫苗网络新闻报道中的情绪化策略
该研究涵盖了后新冠时代的舆论操纵问题。在研究框架内,作者深入研究了记者为实施情绪化策略和将Covid-19疫苗政治化而使用的最常见修辞手段的话语分析,包括对新闻播音员的情感认同、自我呈现以及对伪权威的呼吁。科学结果的可靠性得到了对从英美高发行量论文的在线版本收集的100多篇关于Covid-19疫苗的新闻报道的分析的支持。所进行的研究表明,将有关Covid-19疫苗的新闻报道情绪化是为了政治决策,增强或诋毁疫苗和国家的形象,使社会群体两极分化,并在数字信息战中操纵公众舆论。该研究促进了对媒体操纵工具的深入理解,从而帮助个人发展媒体素养技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信