Risk Transfer Through Commodity Derivatives: A Study of Soyabean Oil

R. Sinha, Ashis Bhuniya
{"title":"Risk Transfer Through Commodity Derivatives: A Study of Soyabean Oil","authors":"R. Sinha, Ashis Bhuniya","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1736406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prices of commodities are determined by the market forces of demand and supply and susceptible to changes due to changes in market forces. The change in market forces within a short period leads to sharp change in prices leading to price volatility. Price risk is the potential for a future price to deviate from the expected value. In ancient times various techniques and tools like arbitrage strategy were adopted by the trader to reduce this risk. The basic arbitrage strategy, buying/selling the cash asset while selling/buying a future contract was practiced in grain trade by Jews during ancient times. This was the past form of present day future contract. Now techniques and tools of financial engineering are applied to that old idea by extension of future trading to commodity or a financial instrument. Though future trading of commodities commenced during British India, it was banned during post independence era in the year 1955. After its reintroduction in the year 2003, the aggregate turnover of commodity exchanges reached to Rs. 7090456 crores, witnessing a spectacular growth of 40% in the year 2008-09. The present study on Soybean futures expiring on April 2010, worked out the hedge ratio based on JSE and HKM methodology. The study shows that hedging effectiveness improves in cross hedging and composite hedging.","PeriodicalId":213755,"journal":{"name":"International Environment of Global Business eJournal","volume":"23 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Environment of Global Business eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1736406","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Prices of commodities are determined by the market forces of demand and supply and susceptible to changes due to changes in market forces. The change in market forces within a short period leads to sharp change in prices leading to price volatility. Price risk is the potential for a future price to deviate from the expected value. In ancient times various techniques and tools like arbitrage strategy were adopted by the trader to reduce this risk. The basic arbitrage strategy, buying/selling the cash asset while selling/buying a future contract was practiced in grain trade by Jews during ancient times. This was the past form of present day future contract. Now techniques and tools of financial engineering are applied to that old idea by extension of future trading to commodity or a financial instrument. Though future trading of commodities commenced during British India, it was banned during post independence era in the year 1955. After its reintroduction in the year 2003, the aggregate turnover of commodity exchanges reached to Rs. 7090456 crores, witnessing a spectacular growth of 40% in the year 2008-09. The present study on Soybean futures expiring on April 2010, worked out the hedge ratio based on JSE and HKM methodology. The study shows that hedging effectiveness improves in cross hedging and composite hedging.
商品衍生品的风险转移:以大豆油为例
商品的价格是由市场的供求力量决定的,而且很容易因市场力量的变化而发生变化。市场力量在短时间内的变化导致价格急剧变化,从而导致价格波动。价格风险是指未来价格偏离预期价值的可能性。在古代,交易者采用套利策略等各种技术和工具来降低这种风险。基本的套利策略,即在买卖未来合约的同时买卖现金资产,是古代犹太人在谷物贸易中实践的。这是现在和将来的契约的过去形式。现在,金融工程的技术和工具通过将期货交易扩展到商品或金融工具来应用于这个古老的想法。虽然未来的商品交易始于英属印度,但在1955年独立后的时代被禁止。在2003年重新引入后,商品交易所的总营业额达到709045.6亿卢比,在2008-09年期间增长了40%。本文以2010年4月到期的大豆期货为研究对象,基于JSE和HKM方法计算出套期保值比率。研究表明,交叉套期和复合套期的套期有效性有所提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信