Parallel Arbitral Proceedings: An Analysis of the Issue of Parallel Arbitrations in International Commercial Arbitration within the European Legal Space

A. Kalantzi
{"title":"Parallel Arbitral Proceedings: An Analysis of the Issue of Parallel Arbitrations in International Commercial Arbitration within the European Legal Space","authors":"A. Kalantzi","doi":"10.1163/27725650-03010001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nAvoiding lis pendens within the EU has always been considered a guarantee for effective judicial cooperation. However, since arbitration is excluded from the scope of European procedural law, questions have been raised as to how parallel arbitral and state court procedures will be regulated. This article aims to illustrate the mechanisms that have been proposed to resolve this issue outside the European Regulations’ scheme with a focus on parallel arbitrations. Under this scope, the author attempts to discuss the potential solutions that have been introduced in respect to “lis pendens” between an arbitral tribunal and a state court as well as their effectiveness. Taken the tie from this analysis, the last part of this article focuses on the issue of parallel arbitral procedures and whether conflicts of jurisdiction can be resolved by using the same mechanisms as adopted in the case of parallel the arbitral and state court proceedings.","PeriodicalId":275877,"journal":{"name":"The Italian Review of International and Comparative Law","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Italian Review of International and Comparative Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/27725650-03010001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Avoiding lis pendens within the EU has always been considered a guarantee for effective judicial cooperation. However, since arbitration is excluded from the scope of European procedural law, questions have been raised as to how parallel arbitral and state court procedures will be regulated. This article aims to illustrate the mechanisms that have been proposed to resolve this issue outside the European Regulations’ scheme with a focus on parallel arbitrations. Under this scope, the author attempts to discuss the potential solutions that have been introduced in respect to “lis pendens” between an arbitral tribunal and a state court as well as their effectiveness. Taken the tie from this analysis, the last part of this article focuses on the issue of parallel arbitral procedures and whether conflicts of jurisdiction can be resolved by using the same mechanisms as adopted in the case of parallel the arbitral and state court proceedings.
平行仲裁程序:欧洲法域内国际商事仲裁平行仲裁问题分析
在欧盟内部避免未决案件一直被认为是有效司法合作的保证。但是,由于仲裁被排除在欧洲程序法的范围之外,因此提出了如何规范平行仲裁和国家法院程序的问题。本文旨在说明在欧洲法规计划之外解决这一问题的机制,重点是平行仲裁。在这一范围内,作者试图讨论就仲裁法庭与国家法院之间的“未决案件”所采用的可能解决办法及其效力。在此基础上,本文的最后一部分重点讨论平行仲裁程序的问题,以及是否可以采用与仲裁程序和国家法院程序平行案件相同的机制来解决管辖权冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信