OPTIMAL CONTROL OF TRANSITION INITIATED BY OBLIQUE WAVES IN CHANNEL FLOW

Markus Hogberg, T. Bewley, M. Berggren, D. Henningson
{"title":"OPTIMAL CONTROL OF TRANSITION INITIATED BY OBLIQUE WAVES IN CHANNEL FLOW","authors":"Markus Hogberg, T. Bewley, M. Berggren, D. Henningson","doi":"10.1615/tsfp2.260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using two diierent approaches to optimal control in channel ow an eeort is made to try to identify diierences and similarities. One approach is to use the Navier{Stokes equations and apply a gradient based optimization technique to nd the optimal control. The other approach is to make use of the linearized equations known as the Orr{Sommerfeld{Squire equations to compute the optimal control. Limiting ourselves to look only at oblique wave perturbations we compare the resulting energy evolution from application of the respective control strategies. Qualitatively the performance of the two approaches are similar, at least when they work under comparable conditions. The non-linear control can be more aggressive initially since there is no direct limitation on the time derivative of the control even though the discretization implicitly enforces some degree of penalty. Adjusting the parameters properly we can show that the control from the two approaches are very similar. Also we try to quantify the performance of the estimator based control, or compensation, using only measurements on the wall, compared to the full-state information control. The performance of the compensator is found to be good for small perturbations, especially if a good initial guess can be provided.","PeriodicalId":438618,"journal":{"name":"Proceeding of Second Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena","volume":"1123 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceeding of Second Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1615/tsfp2.260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Using two diierent approaches to optimal control in channel ow an eeort is made to try to identify diierences and similarities. One approach is to use the Navier{Stokes equations and apply a gradient based optimization technique to nd the optimal control. The other approach is to make use of the linearized equations known as the Orr{Sommerfeld{Squire equations to compute the optimal control. Limiting ourselves to look only at oblique wave perturbations we compare the resulting energy evolution from application of the respective control strategies. Qualitatively the performance of the two approaches are similar, at least when they work under comparable conditions. The non-linear control can be more aggressive initially since there is no direct limitation on the time derivative of the control even though the discretization implicitly enforces some degree of penalty. Adjusting the parameters properly we can show that the control from the two approaches are very similar. Also we try to quantify the performance of the estimator based control, or compensation, using only measurements on the wall, compared to the full-state information control. The performance of the compensator is found to be good for small perturbations, especially if a good initial guess can be provided.
槽流中斜波起始过渡的最优控制
利用两种不同的信道最优控制方法,试图找出两者的异同点。一种方法是使用Navier{Stokes方程并应用基于梯度的优化技术来进行最优控制。另一种方法是利用称为Orr{Sommerfeld{Squire方程的线性化方程来计算最优控制。限制我们自己只看斜波扰动,我们比较从各自的控制策略的应用产生的能量演变。从质量上讲,这两种方法的性能是相似的,至少当它们在可比的条件下工作时是这样。非线性控制最初可以更积极,因为对控制的时间导数没有直接限制,即使离散化隐式地强制执行某种程度的惩罚。适当地调整参数,我们可以看到两种方法的控制非常相似。与全状态信息控制相比,我们还尝试量化基于控制或补偿的估计器的性能,仅使用墙上的测量。我们发现补偿器的性能对于小的扰动是很好的,特别是如果可以提供一个好的初始猜测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信