A Comparative Study of DEA-SFA for Industry-level in China

Zhen Kang, Tae-hwang Kim
{"title":"A Comparative Study of DEA-SFA for Industry-level in China","authors":"Zhen Kang, Tae-hwang Kim","doi":"10.16980/jitc.14.3.201806.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to make a comparative analysis between Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) based efficiency scores and decomposed TFP (Total Factor Productivity) index, which are estimated from constructed industry-level data in China from 1985 to 2014. On one hand, the results are that DEA and SFA efficiency scores appear positively correlated and estimated TFP growth is in similar shape. On the other hand, for industry-level productivity in China, we found that according to the SFA, the estimation of TFP change and all decomposed elements showed a less noisy and much smoother shape when compared to DEA. The paper concludes that for an analysis of TFP of Chinese industry, the methodology of an SFA is more effective in explaining the changes and impacts as compared to the DEA. Since most of China’s industry level productivity studies have been done using DEA, we expect different and more practically significant results for future inter-industry studies. In this context, this paper would contribute to develop analytic methodology of China’s industry level productivity studies.","PeriodicalId":163739,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Model Construction & Selection (Topic)","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Model Construction & Selection (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16980/jitc.14.3.201806.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper aims to make a comparative analysis between Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) based efficiency scores and decomposed TFP (Total Factor Productivity) index, which are estimated from constructed industry-level data in China from 1985 to 2014. On one hand, the results are that DEA and SFA efficiency scores appear positively correlated and estimated TFP growth is in similar shape. On the other hand, for industry-level productivity in China, we found that according to the SFA, the estimation of TFP change and all decomposed elements showed a less noisy and much smoother shape when compared to DEA. The paper concludes that for an analysis of TFP of Chinese industry, the methodology of an SFA is more effective in explaining the changes and impacts as compared to the DEA. Since most of China’s industry level productivity studies have been done using DEA, we expect different and more practically significant results for future inter-industry studies. In this context, this paper would contribute to develop analytic methodology of China’s industry level productivity studies.
中国产业层面DEA-SFA的比较研究
本文利用1985 - 2014年中国构建的产业层面数据,对基于数据包络分析(DEA)和随机前沿分析(SFA)的效率得分和分解后的全要素生产率指数进行比较分析。一方面,结果表明DEA和SFA效率得分呈正相关,估计的TFP增长形状相似。另一方面,对于中国工业层面的生产率,我们发现根据SFA估计的TFP变化和所有分解元素的形状比DEA更小,更平滑。本文的结论是,对于中国工业全要素生产率的分析,SFA方法比DEA更能有效地解释其变化和影响。由于中国产业层面的生产率研究大多是使用DEA进行的,我们期望在未来的产业间研究中得到不同的、更具实际意义的结果。在此背景下,本文将有助于发展中国产业层面生产率研究的分析方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信