Anatomical Things: Introduction

M. Carlyle, Katherine M. Reinhart
{"title":"Anatomical Things: Introduction","authors":"M. Carlyle, Katherine M. Reinhart","doi":"10.1086/718436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A natomy in medieval and early modern europe was a discipline in themaking. It did not enjoy the same authority as the field of medicine or the vocations of the physician or surgeon, even if anatomical knowledge was a part of such disciplinary training. Rarely if ever did one train to become “an anatomist.”This began to change with the late thirteenth-century revival of cadaveric dissection of humans, a practice envisioned but never fully realized by ancients like the Roman physician Galen of Pergamum (ca. 129– ca. 216 CE). From this century onward, anatomy emerged as a new field that contributed to knowledge of the body in important ways. Over the course of the early modern period, anatomy’s identity evolved into the experimental and descriptive scientific discipline that it became known as by the early nineteenth century, an important time in the institutionalization and professionalization of medicine that Michel Foucault has famously examined in The Birth of the Clinic (1973). At the same time that human anatomy emerged as a subject required to practicemedicine, surgery, andmidwifery, its study became","PeriodicalId":187662,"journal":{"name":"KNOW: A Journal on the Formation of Knowledge","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KNOW: A Journal on the Formation of Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/718436","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A natomy in medieval and early modern europe was a discipline in themaking. It did not enjoy the same authority as the field of medicine or the vocations of the physician or surgeon, even if anatomical knowledge was a part of such disciplinary training. Rarely if ever did one train to become “an anatomist.”This began to change with the late thirteenth-century revival of cadaveric dissection of humans, a practice envisioned but never fully realized by ancients like the Roman physician Galen of Pergamum (ca. 129– ca. 216 CE). From this century onward, anatomy emerged as a new field that contributed to knowledge of the body in important ways. Over the course of the early modern period, anatomy’s identity evolved into the experimental and descriptive scientific discipline that it became known as by the early nineteenth century, an important time in the institutionalization and professionalization of medicine that Michel Foucault has famously examined in The Birth of the Clinic (1973). At the same time that human anatomy emerged as a subject required to practicemedicine, surgery, andmidwifery, its study became
解剖学的东西:介绍
在中世纪和近代早期的欧洲,民族学是一门正在形成的学科。它不像医学领域或内科医生或外科医生那样享有同样的权威,即使解剖学知识是此类学科培训的一部分。很少有人被训练成为“解剖学家”。随着13世纪晚期人体解剖的复兴,这种情况开始发生变化,这种做法是古罗马医生加伦(公元129 - 216年)等古人设想的,但从未完全实现。从本世纪开始,解剖学作为一个新的领域出现,在许多重要方面对人体知识做出了贡献。在现代早期的过程中,解剖学的身份演变成实验和描述性的科学学科,并在19世纪早期广为人知,这是医学制度化和专业化的重要时期,米歇尔·福柯(Michel Foucault)在《诊所的诞生》(1973)中进行了著名的研究。与此同时,人体解剖学成为医学、外科和助产学实践所必需的一门学科,它的研究变得
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信