A Comparison of MPPT Solar Charge Controller techniques: A Case for Charging Rate of Battery

Chantima Lapsongphon, Supaporn Nualyai
{"title":"A Comparison of MPPT Solar Charge Controller techniques: A Case for Charging Rate of Battery","authors":"Chantima Lapsongphon, Supaporn Nualyai","doi":"10.1109/RI2C51727.2021.9559787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this research, two MPPT solar charge controller techniques have been measured; Perturb & Observe (P&O) and Incremental Conductance (IC) techniques. The comparison of MPPT solar charge controller techniques has been analyzed for estimating the battery charging rate and system efficiency. To carry out this experiment, the MPPT solar charge controller techniques were applied to the buck converter circuits for extracting maximum power from the PV panel into the battery. Moreover, the MPPT solar charge controller techniques were also tested in a stand-alone PV system with an 80 W PV panel and lead-acid battery which had a capacity of 20 Ah. However, the experimental results indicated that the charging rate of the IC technique can be calculated at 0.83 V/hr, while the other technique is equal to 0.65 V/hr. Furthermore, the total efficiency of the stand-alone PV system with the IC technique is around 95%. This implies that this technique has extremely efficient.","PeriodicalId":422981,"journal":{"name":"2021 Research, Invention, and Innovation Congress: Innovation Electricals and Electronics (RI2C)","volume":"177 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 Research, Invention, and Innovation Congress: Innovation Electricals and Electronics (RI2C)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RI2C51727.2021.9559787","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In this research, two MPPT solar charge controller techniques have been measured; Perturb & Observe (P&O) and Incremental Conductance (IC) techniques. The comparison of MPPT solar charge controller techniques has been analyzed for estimating the battery charging rate and system efficiency. To carry out this experiment, the MPPT solar charge controller techniques were applied to the buck converter circuits for extracting maximum power from the PV panel into the battery. Moreover, the MPPT solar charge controller techniques were also tested in a stand-alone PV system with an 80 W PV panel and lead-acid battery which had a capacity of 20 Ah. However, the experimental results indicated that the charging rate of the IC technique can be calculated at 0.83 V/hr, while the other technique is equal to 0.65 V/hr. Furthermore, the total efficiency of the stand-alone PV system with the IC technique is around 95%. This implies that this technique has extremely efficient.
MPPT太阳能充电控制器技术的比较:以电池充电速率为例
在本研究中,测量了两种MPPT太阳能充电控制器技术;摄动与观察(P&O)和增量电导(IC)技术。分析了MPPT太阳能充电控制器技术的比较,以估计电池充电速率和系统效率。为了进行该实验,将MPPT太阳能充电控制器技术应用于降压转换电路,以从光伏板中提取最大功率到电池中。此外,MPPT太阳能充电控制器技术还在一个独立的光伏系统中进行了测试,该系统使用80 W的光伏电池板和容量为20 Ah的铅酸电池。然而,实验结果表明,IC技术的充电速率可计算为0.83 V/hr,而另一种技术的充电速率为0.65 V/hr。此外,采用集成电路技术的独立光伏系统的总效率约为95%。这意味着这种技术具有极高的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信