Kesejahteraan Masyarakat pada Pemerintah Kabupaten/Kota yang Beropini WTP, WDP, Adverse dan Disclaimer di Propinsi Lampung

Khairudin Khairudin, Tia Rizna Pratiwi, Syahril Daud
{"title":"Kesejahteraan Masyarakat pada Pemerintah Kabupaten/Kota yang Beropini WTP, WDP, Adverse dan Disclaimer di Propinsi Lampung","authors":"Khairudin Khairudin, Tia Rizna Pratiwi, Syahril Daud","doi":"10.25181/ESAI.V13I1.1267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development of audit opinion obtained by the government of regency/city at Lampung Province to date suggests a positive development, with unqualified opinion indicating the highest opinion from the BPK-RI.  This audit opinion results show significant increase for last few years. Further, there are some local governments that have been for more than three years in a row obtaining the opinion of unqualified opinion. However, the development of a positive audit opinion of the local government is not followed by the development of a positive level of welfare. In fact, the Government of Lampung Province is still ranked the fourth lowest in Sumatra as the poorest province. So the audit opinion which is attached to the local government, in particular the perceived unqualified opinion for this community is not prosperous. This research was conducted on the entire local government in Lampung Province for the period of 2011-2015 with the method of comparative analysis, with the data related to the Human Development Index (HDI) of each District/City Government were obtained from BPS Lampung Province and the data in the form of the audit opinion are sourced from the BPK-RI. The results showed that not all local government obtain unqualified opinion automatically related to the increase of the level of the welfare of the community becomes. For this reason, the local government obtaining the unqualified opinion in the financial management should also improve the welfare of the community through an increase in the budget for education, health and other sectors that directly touch on the improvement of the welfare of the community. It is expected the government succeeded not only in financial management but also in development. Keyword: Adverse, Disclaimer, welfare of the community, unqualified opinion, qualified opinion","PeriodicalId":211652,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ilmiah Esai","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ilmiah Esai","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25181/ESAI.V13I1.1267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The development of audit opinion obtained by the government of regency/city at Lampung Province to date suggests a positive development, with unqualified opinion indicating the highest opinion from the BPK-RI.  This audit opinion results show significant increase for last few years. Further, there are some local governments that have been for more than three years in a row obtaining the opinion of unqualified opinion. However, the development of a positive audit opinion of the local government is not followed by the development of a positive level of welfare. In fact, the Government of Lampung Province is still ranked the fourth lowest in Sumatra as the poorest province. So the audit opinion which is attached to the local government, in particular the perceived unqualified opinion for this community is not prosperous. This research was conducted on the entire local government in Lampung Province for the period of 2011-2015 with the method of comparative analysis, with the data related to the Human Development Index (HDI) of each District/City Government were obtained from BPS Lampung Province and the data in the form of the audit opinion are sourced from the BPK-RI. The results showed that not all local government obtain unqualified opinion automatically related to the increase of the level of the welfare of the community becomes. For this reason, the local government obtaining the unqualified opinion in the financial management should also improve the welfare of the community through an increase in the budget for education, health and other sectors that directly touch on the improvement of the welfare of the community. It is expected the government succeeded not only in financial management but also in development. Keyword: Adverse, Disclaimer, welfare of the community, unqualified opinion, qualified opinion
在楠榜省,有WTP、WDP、Adverse和脱诉书的市政政府的福利
迄今为止,楠榜省摄政/市政府获得的审计意见的发展表明了积极的发展,无保留意见表明BPK-RI的最高意见。这一审计意见的结果显示,在过去几年中有了显著的增长。此外,还有一些地方政府连续3年以上获得“不合格意见”。然而,对地方政府的正面审计意见的发展并没有带来正面福利水平的发展。事实上,楠榜省政府仍然是苏门答腊第四贫穷的省份。因此,附属于地方政府的审计意见,特别是被认为不合格的意见,对这个社区来说是不繁荣的。本研究采用比较分析的方法对2011-2015年楠榜省整个地方政府进行了研究,各区市政府的人类发展指数(HDI)相关数据来自BPS楠榜省,审计意见形式的数据来自bpkri。结果表明,并非所有地方政府都自动获得无条件意见,这与社区福利水平的提高有关。因此,地方政府在财政管理中获得不合格意见的地方政府也应该通过增加教育、卫生等直接涉及社区福利改善的部门的预算来改善社区福利。政府不仅在财政管理方面取得了成功,而且在发展方面也取得了成功。关键词:抗辩,免责,社会福利,保留意见,保留意见
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信