Cinema and Philosophical Education: from Wittgenstein to Deleuze

Jūratė Baranova
{"title":"Cinema and Philosophical Education: from Wittgenstein to Deleuze","authors":"Jūratė Baranova","doi":"10.26417/EJLS.V3I1.P21-31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bruce Russell argues, that cinema cannot create the philosophical knowledge for the reason that the answers to philosophical questions are contradictory and not obvious, the explicit argumentation is needed if the person is inclined to give justified answers to philosophical questions. Given examples are not satisfactory for philosophizing. On the other hand Slavoj Žižek, Stanley Cavell and Gilles Deleuze seems do not see this obvious gap between cinema and philosophy. They discuss the cinema as philosophy. What presumptions are needed for this approach? How this approach could be adapted in the philosophy education?","PeriodicalId":350970,"journal":{"name":"EJLS European Journal of Language and Literature Studies Articles","volume":"104 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJLS European Journal of Language and Literature Studies Articles","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26417/EJLS.V3I1.P21-31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bruce Russell argues, that cinema cannot create the philosophical knowledge for the reason that the answers to philosophical questions are contradictory and not obvious, the explicit argumentation is needed if the person is inclined to give justified answers to philosophical questions. Given examples are not satisfactory for philosophizing. On the other hand Slavoj Žižek, Stanley Cavell and Gilles Deleuze seems do not see this obvious gap between cinema and philosophy. They discuss the cinema as philosophy. What presumptions are needed for this approach? How this approach could be adapted in the philosophy education?
电影与哲学教育:从维特根斯坦到德勒兹
布鲁斯·罗素认为,电影不能创造哲学知识,因为哲学问题的答案是矛盾的,不明显的,如果一个人倾向于对哲学问题给出合理的答案,就需要明确的论证。给出的例子对于哲学思考是不令人满意的。另一方面,斯拉沃伊Žižek,斯坦利·卡维尔和吉尔·德勒兹似乎没有看到电影和哲学之间的这种明显的差距。他们把电影当作哲学来讨论。这种方法需要哪些假设?如何将这种方法运用到哲学教育中?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信