Bridge to heart transplantation: importance of patient selection.

The Journal of heart transplantation Pub Date : 1990-09-01
J E Reedy, M T Swartz, D F Termuhlen, D G Pennington, L R McBride, L W Miller, S A Ruzevich
{"title":"Bridge to heart transplantation: importance of patient selection.","authors":"J E Reedy,&nbsp;M T Swartz,&nbsp;D F Termuhlen,&nbsp;D G Pennington,&nbsp;L R McBride,&nbsp;L W Miller,&nbsp;S A Ruzevich","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since 1986, 26 candidates were evaluated for mechanical support as a bridge to heart transplantation. Group 1 consisted of 15 patients who were accepted and who received support with a ventricular assist device (14 patients) or a total artificial heart (1 patient). Seven of the 15 patients received transplants and survived, whereas contraindications to transplant developed in seven patients while they were receiving support, and these seven died. One patient remains hospitalized after transplantation. Group 2 consisted of 11 patients rejected for circulatory support because of renal insufficiency or infection (9), pulmonary embolus (1), and cerebrovascular accident (1). Two group 2 patients underwent transplant procedures after their complications resolved, and one survived. One other group 2 patient who recovered without transplantation or mechanical support was discharged. There was no significant difference in age, gender, or cause of cardiogenic shock between the two groups. Four of five patients accepted for mechanical support on the first evaluation survived, and three of 10 accepted after the initial evaluation survived, indicating that delayed selection often results in complications that preclude transplantation and survival. Only one of the 26 patients survived without transplantation or support. These data emphasize the importance of patient selection on the outcome of bridging to transplantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":77638,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of heart transplantation","volume":"9 5","pages":"473-80; discussion 480-1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of heart transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since 1986, 26 candidates were evaluated for mechanical support as a bridge to heart transplantation. Group 1 consisted of 15 patients who were accepted and who received support with a ventricular assist device (14 patients) or a total artificial heart (1 patient). Seven of the 15 patients received transplants and survived, whereas contraindications to transplant developed in seven patients while they were receiving support, and these seven died. One patient remains hospitalized after transplantation. Group 2 consisted of 11 patients rejected for circulatory support because of renal insufficiency or infection (9), pulmonary embolus (1), and cerebrovascular accident (1). Two group 2 patients underwent transplant procedures after their complications resolved, and one survived. One other group 2 patient who recovered without transplantation or mechanical support was discharged. There was no significant difference in age, gender, or cause of cardiogenic shock between the two groups. Four of five patients accepted for mechanical support on the first evaluation survived, and three of 10 accepted after the initial evaluation survived, indicating that delayed selection often results in complications that preclude transplantation and survival. Only one of the 26 patients survived without transplantation or support. These data emphasize the importance of patient selection on the outcome of bridging to transplantation.

心脏移植的桥梁:患者选择的重要性。
自1986年以来,26名候选人被评估机械支持作为心脏移植的桥梁。第一组15例患者接受心室辅助装置(14例)或全人工心脏(1例)的支持。15名患者中有7名接受了移植并存活,而7名患者在接受支持时出现了移植禁忌症,这7名患者死亡。1例患者移植后仍住院治疗。第二组包括11例因肾功能不全或感染(9例)、肺栓塞(1例)和脑血管意外(1例)而拒绝循环支持的患者。第二组2例患者在并发症消除后接受移植手术,1例存活。另1例2组患者无移植或机械支持康复出院。两组患者在年龄、性别、心源性休克发生原因等方面均无显著差异。首次评估时接受机械支持的5例患者中有4例存活,初次评估后接受机械支持的10例患者中有3例存活,这表明延迟选择往往导致并发症,阻碍移植和生存。26例患者中只有1例在没有移植或支持的情况下存活。这些数据强调了患者选择对移植桥接结果的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信