Applying Depth Correction to Improve Deepwater Reservoir Development

B. Poedjono, Nnadozie Nwosu, Albert Martin
{"title":"Applying Depth Correction to Improve Deepwater Reservoir Development","authors":"B. Poedjono, Nnadozie Nwosu, Albert Martin","doi":"10.4043/29345-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The industry is making discoveries and drilling in areas and formations where along hole depth is of increasing importance. It is essential that the LWD depth meets positional objectives. The driller’s depth, which is the sum of the pipe strap measured while the pipes are on the surface, is used to calculate the logging-while-drilling (LWD) depth. However, environmental corrections must be applied to the driller’s depth resulting from the dynamic mechanical changes pipes undergo while in the borehole, with these corrections applied at the surface. These dynamic changes are due to drilling activities, temperature, and changes in the wellbore profiles and often result in LWD depth being shallower than the actual depth.\n While drilling, dynamic and borehole conditions are known to significantly impact drilling operations and at best a block shift correction or depth matching to wireline depth is applied to the driller’s depth. However, an accurate drill pipe depth determination must include environmental corrections for the dynamic changes in the pipe stretch and compression, which vary with weight on bit, in addition to wellbore profile, torque, drag, friction factor, and borehole temperature.\n In recent years, depth correction has been incorporated successfully in deepwater wells to environmentally correct for these errors and to improve the accuracy of the depth measurement. The challenge for drillers is overcoming the variations in depth measurements, to ensure wellbores are accurately and safely placed in the reservoir. Multiple techniques can be implemented to ensure this occurs, from drill pipe stretch modelling to depth measurements systems. The effect of depth correction has been observed in the multi-well pressure analysis for reservoir compartmentalization studies and fluid contacts.\n Case studies are presented from wells drilled in deepwater where correction was applied to demonstrate its importance in reservoir development. In one case, the placement of pressure and sample points on the most accurate true vertical depth was achieved. By placing the pressure and sample points on the actual depth, a more precise assessment of sand continuity and oil/water contacts was obtained across the field. In another case, determination of the casing landing depth was obtained. In this case, correction was run in near real time to calculate casing stretch, helping to set the casing depth within the expected rathole while running in the hole. The effect of heave on depth on floating rigs often complicates image interpretation. One case study is presented to demonstrate improvement on the image after applying correction.\n Modeling of depth uncertainties prior to drilling to understand the nature and magnitude of the correction is a novel approach and should be utilized in determining in the driller’s depth. The ability to maximize production and optimize drilling time requires LWD/MWD to play a significant role to get it right the first time. Accurate wellbore positioning allows for better reservoir exploitation, landing and setting casing depth, and understanding of the reservoir compartmentalization development risk.","PeriodicalId":214691,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Thu, May 09, 2019","volume":"115 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Thu, May 09, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/29345-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The industry is making discoveries and drilling in areas and formations where along hole depth is of increasing importance. It is essential that the LWD depth meets positional objectives. The driller’s depth, which is the sum of the pipe strap measured while the pipes are on the surface, is used to calculate the logging-while-drilling (LWD) depth. However, environmental corrections must be applied to the driller’s depth resulting from the dynamic mechanical changes pipes undergo while in the borehole, with these corrections applied at the surface. These dynamic changes are due to drilling activities, temperature, and changes in the wellbore profiles and often result in LWD depth being shallower than the actual depth. While drilling, dynamic and borehole conditions are known to significantly impact drilling operations and at best a block shift correction or depth matching to wireline depth is applied to the driller’s depth. However, an accurate drill pipe depth determination must include environmental corrections for the dynamic changes in the pipe stretch and compression, which vary with weight on bit, in addition to wellbore profile, torque, drag, friction factor, and borehole temperature. In recent years, depth correction has been incorporated successfully in deepwater wells to environmentally correct for these errors and to improve the accuracy of the depth measurement. The challenge for drillers is overcoming the variations in depth measurements, to ensure wellbores are accurately and safely placed in the reservoir. Multiple techniques can be implemented to ensure this occurs, from drill pipe stretch modelling to depth measurements systems. The effect of depth correction has been observed in the multi-well pressure analysis for reservoir compartmentalization studies and fluid contacts. Case studies are presented from wells drilled in deepwater where correction was applied to demonstrate its importance in reservoir development. In one case, the placement of pressure and sample points on the most accurate true vertical depth was achieved. By placing the pressure and sample points on the actual depth, a more precise assessment of sand continuity and oil/water contacts was obtained across the field. In another case, determination of the casing landing depth was obtained. In this case, correction was run in near real time to calculate casing stretch, helping to set the casing depth within the expected rathole while running in the hole. The effect of heave on depth on floating rigs often complicates image interpretation. One case study is presented to demonstrate improvement on the image after applying correction. Modeling of depth uncertainties prior to drilling to understand the nature and magnitude of the correction is a novel approach and should be utilized in determining in the driller’s depth. The ability to maximize production and optimize drilling time requires LWD/MWD to play a significant role to get it right the first time. Accurate wellbore positioning allows for better reservoir exploitation, landing and setting casing depth, and understanding of the reservoir compartmentalization development risk.
应用深度校正改进深水油藏开发
在沿井深越来越重要的地区和地层,油气行业正在进行发现和钻探。LWD深度必须满足定位目标。钻具深度是在地面上测量到的管带的总和,用于计算随钻测井(LWD)深度。然而,由于管道在井中所经历的动态力学变化,必须对钻工的深度进行环境校正,这些校正将应用于地面。这些动态变化是由钻井活动、温度和井筒轮廓变化引起的,通常会导致随钻深度小于实际深度。在钻井过程中,动态和井眼条件会对钻井作业产生重大影响,最多只能对钻井深度进行块移校正或与电缆深度匹配的深度。然而,要准确确定钻杆深度,除了井筒轮廓、扭矩、阻力、摩擦系数和井眼温度外,还必须包括对钻杆拉伸和压缩动态变化的环境校正。近年来,深度校正已成功应用于深水井中,以对这些误差进行环境校正,并提高深度测量的精度。钻井人员面临的挑战是克服深度测量的变化,以确保井眼准确、安全地放置在储层中。从钻杆拉伸建模到深度测量系统,可以采用多种技术来确保实现这一目标。在储层分区研究和流体接触的多井压力分析中,已经观察到深度校正的效果。本文介绍了一些深水井的案例研究,在这些井中进行了校正,以证明校正在油藏开发中的重要性。在一种情况下,压力和样品点的放置在最准确的真实垂直深度上。通过将压力和采样点置于实际深度,可以更精确地评估整个油田的砂体连续性和油水接触。在另一种情况下,获得了套管着陆深度的确定。在这种情况下,校正工作几乎是实时进行的,以计算套管拉伸,帮助在下入井眼时将套管深度设置在预期的井眼范围内。浮式钻井平台的升沉对深度的影响往往使图像解释复杂化。最后通过一个实例说明了校正后图像的改善。在钻井之前对深度不确定性进行建模,以了解校正的性质和幅度,这是一种新颖的方法,应该用于确定钻井人员的深度。为了最大限度地提高产量和优化钻井时间,LWD/MWD必须发挥重要作用,才能在第一次就做到正确。准确的井筒定位可以更好地开发油藏、下入和下入套管深度,并了解油藏分区开发风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信