Brazilian Freight Rail Concessions Overview: Current Outcomes and Perspectives

Fábio C. Barbosa
{"title":"Brazilian Freight Rail Concessions Overview: Current Outcomes and Perspectives","authors":"Fábio C. Barbosa","doi":"10.1115/JRC2019-1237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The formerly public owned Brazilian Freight Rail System was under pressure in the middle nineties, mainly due to the revenue insufficiency, resulting from the government rate control policy and the inherent lack of investments, as well as the increasing funding requirements from the public budget. In this context, the system has been denationalized in the mid nineties, following a corridor format, with 11 regionalized concessions, with 30 year term contracts, running under a price-cap rate regime. The denationalization model has set contractual production and safety targets, which ultimately have indirectly set the required investments to comply with the contractual targets. The post denationalization scenario has allowed the rehabilitation of the former freight rail installed capacity, as a result of private investments on both rail network and rolling stock. The acknowledged freight rail system installed capacity recovery, followed by a profit guided management, have fostered the improvement of freight rail system’s performance, which ultimately have been translated into system’s production and safety enhancements. Albeit the huge advances observed during the first half of contract terms, there were some hurdles to be addressed, mainly the low interoperability/interchange rates, as well as the lack of greenfield investments, required for the necessary expansion of the Brazilian rail network. In this context, the regulatory authority has issued, in 2011, a rail regulatory package reform, focused on: i) interoperability improvement; ii) a widespread service coverage along the rail network (stretches production targets) and iii) a compilation of rail stakeholders (shippers and carriers) rights and obligations. The so called 2011 rail regulatory package has brought more transparency and equilibrium among shippers and carriers relationship, but has not addressed the lack of greenfield required rail investments, necessary to expand the freight rail share on Brazilian transport matrix. In this context, the Brazilian Government has proposed in 2012 the Freight Rail System Unbundling (Open Access Model), in which infrastructure managers would be in charge of providing rail capacity (with the guarantee of the demand risk covered by the Brazilian government) and granted rail operators allowed to operate on the network under a fee payment. However, the unbundled freight rail proposal has not evolved, mainly due to the lack of funding required to guarantee rail infrastructure managers return on investments, resulted from a strong fiscal crisis. Currently, the Brazilian Rail Regulatoy Authority is working on a proposal to extend the current (bundled) freight rail contracts, conditioned to contractual adjustments, focused on the imposition of mandatory investments for capacity improvement and interoperability enhancement. This work is supposed to present an overview of Brazilian Freight Rail System’s performance evolution since the denationalization process, followed by an assessment of the 2011 Rail Regulatory Reform, the 2012 Rail Unbunbled initiative attempt and the perspectives associated with the current freight rail bundled contract term extension proposal.","PeriodicalId":287025,"journal":{"name":"2019 Joint Rail Conference","volume":"195 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 Joint Rail Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/JRC2019-1237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The formerly public owned Brazilian Freight Rail System was under pressure in the middle nineties, mainly due to the revenue insufficiency, resulting from the government rate control policy and the inherent lack of investments, as well as the increasing funding requirements from the public budget. In this context, the system has been denationalized in the mid nineties, following a corridor format, with 11 regionalized concessions, with 30 year term contracts, running under a price-cap rate regime. The denationalization model has set contractual production and safety targets, which ultimately have indirectly set the required investments to comply with the contractual targets. The post denationalization scenario has allowed the rehabilitation of the former freight rail installed capacity, as a result of private investments on both rail network and rolling stock. The acknowledged freight rail system installed capacity recovery, followed by a profit guided management, have fostered the improvement of freight rail system’s performance, which ultimately have been translated into system’s production and safety enhancements. Albeit the huge advances observed during the first half of contract terms, there were some hurdles to be addressed, mainly the low interoperability/interchange rates, as well as the lack of greenfield investments, required for the necessary expansion of the Brazilian rail network. In this context, the regulatory authority has issued, in 2011, a rail regulatory package reform, focused on: i) interoperability improvement; ii) a widespread service coverage along the rail network (stretches production targets) and iii) a compilation of rail stakeholders (shippers and carriers) rights and obligations. The so called 2011 rail regulatory package has brought more transparency and equilibrium among shippers and carriers relationship, but has not addressed the lack of greenfield required rail investments, necessary to expand the freight rail share on Brazilian transport matrix. In this context, the Brazilian Government has proposed in 2012 the Freight Rail System Unbundling (Open Access Model), in which infrastructure managers would be in charge of providing rail capacity (with the guarantee of the demand risk covered by the Brazilian government) and granted rail operators allowed to operate on the network under a fee payment. However, the unbundled freight rail proposal has not evolved, mainly due to the lack of funding required to guarantee rail infrastructure managers return on investments, resulted from a strong fiscal crisis. Currently, the Brazilian Rail Regulatoy Authority is working on a proposal to extend the current (bundled) freight rail contracts, conditioned to contractual adjustments, focused on the imposition of mandatory investments for capacity improvement and interoperability enhancement. This work is supposed to present an overview of Brazilian Freight Rail System’s performance evolution since the denationalization process, followed by an assessment of the 2011 Rail Regulatory Reform, the 2012 Rail Unbunbled initiative attempt and the perspectives associated with the current freight rail bundled contract term extension proposal.
巴西货运铁路特许权概述:目前的成果和前景
原国有的巴西货运铁路系统在90年代中期面临压力,主要是由于政府的利率控制政策和固有的投资不足导致收入不足,以及公共预算的资金需求不断增加。在这方面,该系统已在九十年代中期实行非国有化,采用走廊形式,有11个区域化特许权,有30年期限合同,在价格上限费率制度下运行。非国有化模式设定了合同生产和安全目标,这些目标最终间接设定了遵守合同目标所需的投资。在非国有化后的情况下,由于私人对铁路网和铁路车辆进行了投资,以前的货运铁路装机容量得以恢复。货运铁路系统装机容量的恢复,以及随之而来的以利润为导向的管理,促进了货运铁路系统性能的改善,最终转化为系统生产和安全的增强。尽管在合同期限的前半段取得了巨大进展,但仍有一些障碍需要解决,主要是互操作性/交换率低,以及缺乏绿地投资,这是巴西铁路网必要扩张所必需的。在此背景下,监管机构于2011年发布了铁路监管一揽子改革,重点是:1)提高互操作性;Ii)铁路网络的广泛服务覆盖(延伸生产目标)和iii)铁路利益相关者(托运人和承运人)权利和义务的汇编。所谓的2011年铁路监管一揽子计划使托运人和承运人之间的关系更加透明和平衡,但并没有解决缺乏所需的新建铁路投资的问题,这是扩大巴西运输矩阵中货运铁路份额所必需的。在这种情况下,巴西政府在2012年提出了货运铁路系统分拆(开放获取模式),在这种模式下,基础设施管理者将负责提供铁路运力(巴西政府承担需求风险的保证),并允许铁路运营商在支付费用的情况下在网络上运营。然而,非捆绑货运铁路的提议并没有得到发展,主要原因是严重的财政危机导致缺乏保证铁路基础设施管理者投资回报所需的资金。目前,巴西铁路管理局(Brazilian Rail regulatory Authority)正在制定一项提案,以扩大现有的(捆绑)货运铁路合同,以合同调整为条件,重点是实施强制性投资,以提高运力和增强互操作性。本研究旨在概述巴西货运铁路系统自非国有化进程以来的绩效演变,随后评估2011年的铁路监管改革、2012年的铁路整合倡议尝试,以及与当前货运铁路捆绑合同期限延长提案相关的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信