Between “Acts-And-Facts History” and “Edutainment” in the History of Education Study Courses: The Case of University of Latvia

I. Ķestere, Reinis Vējiņš
{"title":"Between “Acts-And-Facts History” and “Edutainment” in the History of Education Study Courses: The Case of University of Latvia","authors":"I. Ķestere, Reinis Vējiņš","doi":"10.22364/htqe.2021.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At present, the history of education is experiencing a paradox: research in the history of education is flourishing, but the history of education as a study subject is losing its relevance in university curricula. The present research aims at examining the potential of education history in student-centred and research-based study process while addressing the experience in teaching education history in master’s study programmes at the University of Latvia from 1920 to 2020. The article comprises three sections: the first section offers an overview of the evolvement of the history of education as a study subject in Europe and Latvia; the second section, based on the experience of teaching the history of education and research in history didactics, reveals three possible approaches to the study course in the history of education; the third section foregrounds the integration of digitized historical sources in the delivery of student-centred and research-based education history courses. The research demonstrates that each of the three approaches (“acts-and-facts history,” “problem-oriented history of education,” and “edutainment”) has student-centred potential in shaping historical thinking. The student-centred study process in a modern university is closely related to research-based studies, which in the study course of education history means independent research of history aligned with students’ individual interests in the field of education.","PeriodicalId":173607,"journal":{"name":"Human, Technologies and Quality of Education, 2021","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human, Technologies and Quality of Education, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22364/htqe.2021.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

At present, the history of education is experiencing a paradox: research in the history of education is flourishing, but the history of education as a study subject is losing its relevance in university curricula. The present research aims at examining the potential of education history in student-centred and research-based study process while addressing the experience in teaching education history in master’s study programmes at the University of Latvia from 1920 to 2020. The article comprises three sections: the first section offers an overview of the evolvement of the history of education as a study subject in Europe and Latvia; the second section, based on the experience of teaching the history of education and research in history didactics, reveals three possible approaches to the study course in the history of education; the third section foregrounds the integration of digitized historical sources in the delivery of student-centred and research-based education history courses. The research demonstrates that each of the three approaches (“acts-and-facts history,” “problem-oriented history of education,” and “edutainment”) has student-centred potential in shaping historical thinking. The student-centred study process in a modern university is closely related to research-based studies, which in the study course of education history means independent research of history aligned with students’ individual interests in the field of education.
在教育学研究课程中的“行为与事实史”与“寓教于乐”之间——以拉脱维亚大学为例
当前,教育史研究正经历着一个悖论:教育史研究方兴未盛,而教育史作为一门研究学科在大学课程中却失去了相关性。目前的研究旨在研究以学生为中心和以研究为基础的学习过程中教育史的潜力,同时解决1920年至2020年拉脱维亚大学硕士学习课程中教育史教学的经验。本文包括三个部分:第一部分概述了欧洲和拉脱维亚作为研究课题的教育史的演变;第二部分根据教育史教学的经验和历史教学法的研究,揭示了教育史学习课程的三种可能途径;第三部分论述了在以学生为中心、以研究为基础的教育历史课程中整合数字化历史资源的问题。研究表明,三种方法(“行为与事实的历史”、“问题导向的教育历史”和“寓教于乐”)在塑造历史思维方面都具有以学生为中心的潜力。现代大学以学生为中心的学习过程与研究性学习密切相关,研究性学习在教育史的学习过程中意味着与学生在教育领域的个人兴趣相一致的对历史的独立研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信