James Baldwin’s Black Power: No Name in the Street, Fanon, Camus, and the Black Panthers

James Miller
{"title":"James Baldwin’s Black Power: No Name in the Street, Fanon, Camus, and the Black Panthers","authors":"James Miller","doi":"10.5040/9781501337741.ch-010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"My paper examines James Baldwin’s intellectual involvement with the concept of Black Power, concentrating on his long essay, ‘No Name in the Street’ (1972). Neither this essay, nor Baldwin’s engagement with the movement, have received any substantial scholarly attention. \n \nI examine the extent to which Baldwin’s essay revises, adapts and to some extent distorts Frantz Fanon’s ideas in The Wretched of the Earth. I argue that Baldwin adopts Fanon’s anti-Western, anti-humanist perspective to condemn white, Euro-American culture and to try and forge a symbolic moral allegiance between Third World freedom fighters and African-Americans. \n \nI demonstrate how this antagonistic and rejectionist perspective differed from the much more complex and involved engagement with Euro-American culture outlined in Baldwin’s earlier essays, particular ‘Princes and Powers’ (1956) his account of the First International Conference of Black Writers and Artists, and the only time Baldwin, Richard Wright and Fanon were gathered together under one roof. \n \nI ask how far Baldwin struggled to compare and cohere the predominantly racial focus of the Black Power movement with the territorial demands of Third World anti-colonial struggle. \n \nI conclude by demonstrating that Baldwin, by negotiating between Fanon and Black Power activists, articulates a sense of Black Power as a form of sceptical consciousness able to question, contest and transform white ideologies of identity and history.","PeriodicalId":211777,"journal":{"name":"Of Latitudes Unknown","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Of Latitudes Unknown","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781501337741.ch-010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

My paper examines James Baldwin’s intellectual involvement with the concept of Black Power, concentrating on his long essay, ‘No Name in the Street’ (1972). Neither this essay, nor Baldwin’s engagement with the movement, have received any substantial scholarly attention. I examine the extent to which Baldwin’s essay revises, adapts and to some extent distorts Frantz Fanon’s ideas in The Wretched of the Earth. I argue that Baldwin adopts Fanon’s anti-Western, anti-humanist perspective to condemn white, Euro-American culture and to try and forge a symbolic moral allegiance between Third World freedom fighters and African-Americans. I demonstrate how this antagonistic and rejectionist perspective differed from the much more complex and involved engagement with Euro-American culture outlined in Baldwin’s earlier essays, particular ‘Princes and Powers’ (1956) his account of the First International Conference of Black Writers and Artists, and the only time Baldwin, Richard Wright and Fanon were gathered together under one roof. I ask how far Baldwin struggled to compare and cohere the predominantly racial focus of the Black Power movement with the territorial demands of Third World anti-colonial struggle. I conclude by demonstrating that Baldwin, by negotiating between Fanon and Black Power activists, articulates a sense of Black Power as a form of sceptical consciousness able to question, contest and transform white ideologies of identity and history.
詹姆斯·鲍德温的《黑人权力:街上无人知晓》、法农、加缪和黑豹党
我的论文考察了詹姆斯·鲍德温(James Baldwin)对黑人权力概念的智力参与,重点研究了他的长文《街上没有名字》(1972)。无论是这篇文章,还是鲍德温参与的运动,都没有得到任何实质性的学术关注。我考察了鲍德温的文章在多大程度上修改、改编并在某种程度上扭曲了弗朗茨·法农在《悲惨的地球》中的观点。我认为鲍德温采用了法农的反西方、反人道主义观点来谴责白人、欧美文化,并试图在第三世界自由战士和非裔美国人之间建立一种象征性的道德忠诚。我展示了这种对抗和拒绝主义的观点如何不同于鲍德温早期的文章中所概述的更复杂和更复杂的欧美文化,特别是1956年的《王子与权力》,他对第一届黑人作家和艺术家国际会议的描述,这是鲍德温、理查德·赖特和法农唯一一次聚在一起。我问鲍德温在将黑人权力运动的主要种族焦点与第三世界反殖民斗争的领土要求进行比较和联系方面做了多大的努力。我的结论是,鲍德温通过在法农和黑人权力活动家之间的谈判,清楚地表达了一种黑人权力的意识,即一种怀疑意识的形式,能够质疑、挑战和改变白人的身份和历史意识形态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信