Kvantitativna znanost o književnosti i interpretacija

Miran Hladnik
{"title":"Kvantitativna znanost o književnosti i interpretacija","authors":"Miran Hladnik","doi":"10.22210/ur.2020.064.3_4/05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"QUANTITATIVE LITERARY STUDIES AND INTERPRETATION\n\nThe analysis of the author’s own past research has shown that digital tools do not have a significant role in contributing to new interpretations of the Slovene literary canon. However, when shifting the subject of interpretation from a single work to authorial opera, genre corpora, literary period or the entire national literature, it becomes clear how quantitative methods, stimulated by digitalisation of the cul-tural past, literary databases and digital tools play a vital role. Interpretations that consider the richness of data, generated by digital culture, are more trustworthy than the former ones.The price we pay for that is the refusal of clear encyclopaedic definitions and de-scriptions. Literary past, observed through the digital humanities’ perspective has a fuzzy development because the central phaenomena gradually fade in the multitude of rival or peripheral phenomena. Slovene literature is not represented by prominent authors and their famous works any more, it does not comply with dictation of the great national myth, i.e., the construction of the nation from the spirit of literature. Rather, it is considered as a random fact, a matter of serendipity. It is represented as the entire literary production on the Slovene territory, in Slovene as well as other languages. Due to special circumstances, it is different from the neighbouring literatures and it triggers new, nation-specific definitions of literary phenomena.New interpretations of Slovene literature are not only indebted to the use of digital tools, but also to the consequence of changes within the literary system itself. In its beginnings, Slovene literature was dedicated to the constitution and emancipation of the nation, while now it also legitimately fulfils other human needs and functions: cultural recreation, women and social minorities’ emancipation and mobilisation, escapism, self-reflection, self-therapy, testing of the alternative models of social behaviour, etc.","PeriodicalId":371506,"journal":{"name":"Umjetnost riječi: časopis za znanost o književnosti, izvedbenoj umjetnosti i filmu","volume":"318 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Umjetnost riječi: časopis za znanost o književnosti, izvedbenoj umjetnosti i filmu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22210/ur.2020.064.3_4/05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

QUANTITATIVE LITERARY STUDIES AND INTERPRETATION The analysis of the author’s own past research has shown that digital tools do not have a significant role in contributing to new interpretations of the Slovene literary canon. However, when shifting the subject of interpretation from a single work to authorial opera, genre corpora, literary period or the entire national literature, it becomes clear how quantitative methods, stimulated by digitalisation of the cul-tural past, literary databases and digital tools play a vital role. Interpretations that consider the richness of data, generated by digital culture, are more trustworthy than the former ones.The price we pay for that is the refusal of clear encyclopaedic definitions and de-scriptions. Literary past, observed through the digital humanities’ perspective has a fuzzy development because the central phaenomena gradually fade in the multitude of rival or peripheral phenomena. Slovene literature is not represented by prominent authors and their famous works any more, it does not comply with dictation of the great national myth, i.e., the construction of the nation from the spirit of literature. Rather, it is considered as a random fact, a matter of serendipity. It is represented as the entire literary production on the Slovene territory, in Slovene as well as other languages. Due to special circumstances, it is different from the neighbouring literatures and it triggers new, nation-specific definitions of literary phenomena.New interpretations of Slovene literature are not only indebted to the use of digital tools, but also to the consequence of changes within the literary system itself. In its beginnings, Slovene literature was dedicated to the constitution and emancipation of the nation, while now it also legitimately fulfils other human needs and functions: cultural recreation, women and social minorities’ emancipation and mobilisation, escapism, self-reflection, self-therapy, testing of the alternative models of social behaviour, etc.
文学与阐释定量科学
定量文学研究和解释对作者自己过去研究的分析表明,数字工具在促进斯洛文尼亚文学经典的新解释方面没有重要作用。然而,当将解释的主题从单个作品转移到作者歌剧、体裁语料库、文学时期或整个民族文学时,很明显,由文化过去、文学数据库和数字工具的数字化刺激的定量方法发挥了至关重要的作用。考虑到数字文化产生的数据丰富性的解释,比前一种解释更值得信赖。我们为此付出的代价是拒绝接受百科全书式的清晰定义和描述。通过数字人文的视角观察,文学的过去有一种模糊的发展,因为中心现象在众多竞争或边缘现象中逐渐消失。斯洛文尼亚文学不再以著名作家和他们的著名作品为代表,它不符合伟大的民族神话的口述,即从文学精神中构建民族。相反,它被认为是一个随机的事实,一个偶然发现的问题。它代表了斯洛文尼亚领土上所有的文学作品,包括斯洛文尼亚语和其他语言。由于特殊的环境,它与周围的文学不同,并引发了新的,具有民族特色的文学现象定义。对斯洛文尼亚文学的新解读不仅得益于数字工具的使用,也得益于文学系统本身的变化。最初,斯洛文尼亚文学致力于国家的宪法和解放,而现在它也合法地满足了人类的其他需求和功能:文化娱乐、妇女和社会少数群体的解放和动员、逃避现实、自我反思、自我治疗、对社会行为的替代模式的测试等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信