Cognitive aging in rural communities: preliminary memory characterization of a community cohort from Southern Nevada

Justin B. Miller, C. Wong, J. Caldwell, Jessica Rodrigues, Shehroo B. Pudumjee, Samantha E John, A. Ritter
{"title":"Cognitive aging in rural communities: preliminary memory characterization of a community cohort from Southern Nevada","authors":"Justin B. Miller, C. Wong, J. Caldwell, Jessica Rodrigues, Shehroo B. Pudumjee, Samantha E John, A. Ritter","doi":"10.3389/frdem.2023.1236039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rural-dwelling older adults face unique health challenges that may increase risk for Alzheimer's disease and dementia but are underrepresented in aging research. Here, we present an initial characterization of a rural community cohort compared to an urban cohort from the same region.Adults over age 50 living in a non-metropolitan area are clinically characterized using the Uniform Data Set, enriched with additional measures of verbal and non-verbal memory measures. Neighborhood disadvantage is also assessed. Clinical and cognitive differences between cohorts were explored after stratifying by cognitive impairment.Between group comparisons found that rural-dwellers demonstrated better verbal memory than urban-dwellers on primary indices of learning, recall, and recognition, with small to medium effects in overall comparisons. When stratified by impairment, rural-urban differences were notably larger among cognitively normal individuals. Within-group comparisons found that the magnitude of impairment between cognitively normal and impaired groups was greater among rural-dwellers compared to urban-dwellers. No differences in non-verbal memory or overall clinical status were found, and there were no effects of neighborhood disadvantage on any cognitive measure.Living in a rural community presents a complex set of contextual factors that for some, may increase risk for dementia. In this study, we found small to moderate memory advantages for rural-dwellers, leaving open the possibility that late-life rural living may be advantageous for some and promote resilience. Additional prospective research is critically needed to better understand the factors that influence aging outcomes in this underrepresented population.","PeriodicalId":408305,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Dementia","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Dementia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frdem.2023.1236039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rural-dwelling older adults face unique health challenges that may increase risk for Alzheimer's disease and dementia but are underrepresented in aging research. Here, we present an initial characterization of a rural community cohort compared to an urban cohort from the same region.Adults over age 50 living in a non-metropolitan area are clinically characterized using the Uniform Data Set, enriched with additional measures of verbal and non-verbal memory measures. Neighborhood disadvantage is also assessed. Clinical and cognitive differences between cohorts were explored after stratifying by cognitive impairment.Between group comparisons found that rural-dwellers demonstrated better verbal memory than urban-dwellers on primary indices of learning, recall, and recognition, with small to medium effects in overall comparisons. When stratified by impairment, rural-urban differences were notably larger among cognitively normal individuals. Within-group comparisons found that the magnitude of impairment between cognitively normal and impaired groups was greater among rural-dwellers compared to urban-dwellers. No differences in non-verbal memory or overall clinical status were found, and there were no effects of neighborhood disadvantage on any cognitive measure.Living in a rural community presents a complex set of contextual factors that for some, may increase risk for dementia. In this study, we found small to moderate memory advantages for rural-dwellers, leaving open the possibility that late-life rural living may be advantageous for some and promote resilience. Additional prospective research is critically needed to better understand the factors that influence aging outcomes in this underrepresented population.
农村社区的认知老化:来自南内华达州社区队列的初步记忆特征
居住在农村的老年人面临着独特的健康挑战,可能会增加患阿尔茨海默病和痴呆症的风险,但在老龄化研究中代表性不足。在这里,我们提出了来自同一地区的农村社区队列与城市队列的初步特征。使用统一数据集对生活在非大都市地区的50岁以上的成年人进行临床特征描述,该数据集丰富了语言和非语言记忆测量的额外测量。邻里劣势也被评估。在按认知障碍进行分层后,探讨队列之间的临床和认知差异。组间比较发现,在学习、回忆和识别的主要指标上,农村居民比城市居民表现出更好的言语记忆,在总体比较中有小到中等的影响。当按损伤分层时,城乡差异在认知正常个体中明显更大。组内比较发现,与城市居民相比,农村居民的认知正常组和认知受损组之间的损伤程度更大。在非言语记忆和整体临床状况方面没有发现差异,邻里不利对任何认知测量都没有影响。生活在农村社区存在一系列复杂的背景因素,对一些人来说,这些因素可能会增加患痴呆症的风险。在这项研究中,我们发现农村居民有小到中等程度的记忆优势,这使得农村生活对一些人来说可能是有利的,并促进了他们的恢复力。迫切需要进一步的前瞻性研究,以更好地了解影响这一代表性不足人群老龄化结果的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信