Improving Automated Email Tagging with Implicit Feedback

Mohammad S. Sorower, Michael Slater, Thomas G. Dietterich
{"title":"Improving Automated Email Tagging with Implicit Feedback","authors":"Mohammad S. Sorower, Michael Slater, Thomas G. Dietterich","doi":"10.1145/2807442.2807501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tagging email is an important tactic for managing information overload. Machine learning methods can help the user with this task by predicting tags for incoming email messages. The natural user interface displays the predicted tags on the email message, and the user doesn't need to do anything unless those predictions are wrong (in which case, the user can delete the incorrect tags and add the missing tags). From a machine learning perspective, this means that the learning algorithm never receives confirmation that its predictions are correct---it only receives feedback when it makes a mistake. This can lead to slower learning, particularly when the predictions were not very confident, and hence, the learning algorithm would benefit from positive feedback. One could assume that if the user never changes any tag, then the predictions are correct, but users sometimes forget to correct the tags, presumably because they are focused on the content of the email messages and fail to notice incorrect and missing tags. The aim of this paper is to determine whether implicit feedback can provide useful additional training examples to the email prediction subsystem of TaskTracer, known as EP2 (Email Predictor 2). Our hypothesis is that the more time a user spends working on an email message, the more likely it is that the user will notice tag errors and correct them. If no corrections are made, then perhaps it is safe for the learning system to treat the predicted tags as being correct and train accordingly. This paper proposes three algorithms (and two baselines) for incorporating implicit feedback into the EP2 tag predictor. These algorithms are then evaluated using email interaction and tag correction events collected from 14 user-study participants as they performed email-directed tasks while using TaskTracer EP2. The results show that implicit feedback produces important increases in training feedback, and hence, significant reductions in subsequent prediction errors despite the fact that the implicit feedback is not perfect. We conclude that implicit feedback mechanisms can provide a useful performance boost for email tagging systems.","PeriodicalId":103668,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software & Technology","volume":"239 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2807442.2807501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Tagging email is an important tactic for managing information overload. Machine learning methods can help the user with this task by predicting tags for incoming email messages. The natural user interface displays the predicted tags on the email message, and the user doesn't need to do anything unless those predictions are wrong (in which case, the user can delete the incorrect tags and add the missing tags). From a machine learning perspective, this means that the learning algorithm never receives confirmation that its predictions are correct---it only receives feedback when it makes a mistake. This can lead to slower learning, particularly when the predictions were not very confident, and hence, the learning algorithm would benefit from positive feedback. One could assume that if the user never changes any tag, then the predictions are correct, but users sometimes forget to correct the tags, presumably because they are focused on the content of the email messages and fail to notice incorrect and missing tags. The aim of this paper is to determine whether implicit feedback can provide useful additional training examples to the email prediction subsystem of TaskTracer, known as EP2 (Email Predictor 2). Our hypothesis is that the more time a user spends working on an email message, the more likely it is that the user will notice tag errors and correct them. If no corrections are made, then perhaps it is safe for the learning system to treat the predicted tags as being correct and train accordingly. This paper proposes three algorithms (and two baselines) for incorporating implicit feedback into the EP2 tag predictor. These algorithms are then evaluated using email interaction and tag correction events collected from 14 user-study participants as they performed email-directed tasks while using TaskTracer EP2. The results show that implicit feedback produces important increases in training feedback, and hence, significant reductions in subsequent prediction errors despite the fact that the implicit feedback is not perfect. We conclude that implicit feedback mechanisms can provide a useful performance boost for email tagging systems.
使用隐式反馈改进自动电子邮件标签
给邮件加标签是管理信息过载的重要策略。机器学习方法可以通过预测传入电子邮件的标签来帮助用户完成这项任务。自然的用户界面在电子邮件消息中显示预测的标记,用户不需要做任何事情,除非这些预测是错误的(在这种情况下,用户可以删除错误的标记并添加缺失的标记)。从机器学习的角度来看,这意味着学习算法永远不会收到预测正确的确认——它只会在犯错时收到反馈。这可能会导致学习速度变慢,特别是当预测不是很自信时,因此,学习算法将受益于正反馈。可以假设,如果用户从不更改任何标记,那么预测是正确的,但是用户有时会忘记纠正标记,可能是因为他们专注于电子邮件消息的内容,而没有注意到错误和丢失的标记。本文的目的是确定隐式反馈是否可以为TaskTracer的电子邮件预测子系统(称为EP2 (email Predictor 2))提供有用的额外训练示例。我们的假设是,用户在电子邮件消息上花费的时间越多,用户就越有可能注意到标签错误并纠正它们。如果没有进行任何修正,那么学习系统将预测的标签视为正确并进行相应的训练可能是安全的。本文提出了三种算法(和两个基线),将隐式反馈纳入EP2标签预测器。然后使用电子邮件交互和从14名用户研究参与者收集的标签纠正事件来评估这些算法,因为他们在使用TaskTracer EP2时执行电子邮件定向任务。结果表明,尽管隐式反馈并不完美,但隐式反馈会显著增加训练反馈,从而显著减少后续的预测误差。我们得出结论,隐式反馈机制可以为电子邮件标签系统提供有用的性能提升。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信