Lexical Models to Identify Unmarked Discourse Relations: Does WordNet help?

C. Sporleder
{"title":"Lexical Models to Identify Unmarked Discourse Relations: Does WordNet help?","authors":"C. Sporleder","doi":"10.21248/jlcl.23.2008.105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we address the task of automatically determining which discourse relation holds between two text spans. We focus on relations that are not explicitly signalled by a discourse marker like but. While lexical models have been found useful for the task, they are also prone to data sparseness problems, which is a big drawback given the scarcity of discourse annotated data. We therefore investigate whether the use of lexical-semantic resources, such as WordNet, can be exploited to back-off to a more general representation of lexical information in cases were data are sparse. We compare such a semantic back-off strategy to morphological generalisations over word forms, such as stemming and lemmatising.","PeriodicalId":402489,"journal":{"name":"J. Lang. Technol. Comput. Linguistics","volume":"102 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Lang. Technol. Comput. Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21248/jlcl.23.2008.105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

In this paper, we address the task of automatically determining which discourse relation holds between two text spans. We focus on relations that are not explicitly signalled by a discourse marker like but. While lexical models have been found useful for the task, they are also prone to data sparseness problems, which is a big drawback given the scarcity of discourse annotated data. We therefore investigate whether the use of lexical-semantic resources, such as WordNet, can be exploited to back-off to a more general representation of lexical information in cases were data are sparse. We compare such a semantic back-off strategy to morphological generalisations over word forms, such as stemming and lemmatising.
词汇模型识别未标记语篇关系:WordNet有帮助吗?
在本文中,我们解决了自动确定两个文本范围之间的话语关系的任务。我们关注的是那些没有像but这样的话语标记明确表示的关系。虽然已经发现词法模型对任务很有用,但它们也容易出现数据稀疏问题,这是一个很大的缺点,因为话语注释数据的稀缺性。因此,我们研究在数据稀疏的情况下,是否可以利用词汇语义资源(如WordNet)来退回到词汇信息的更一般的表示。我们将这种语义后退策略与词形的形态概括进行比较,例如词干化和词形化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信