A tale of two towns: human security and the limits of post-war normalization in Bosnia-Herzegovina

Timothy Donais
{"title":"A tale of two towns: human security and the limits of post-war normalization in Bosnia-Herzegovina","authors":"Timothy Donais","doi":"10.1080/14613190500036693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After nearly a decade of concerted international effort, Bosnia-Herzegovina appears finally to have been coerced and cajoled onto an irreversible path towards sustainable peace and eventual European integration. The past several years have seen repeated breakthroughs on Bosnia’s peacebuilding front: a million war-displaced persons have now at least partially reversed the results of ethnic cleansing by returning home, while the elements of a functional Bosnian state—including a single army, state customs and border services, and even a European-style value-added tax—are slowly falling into place. At the same time, the forces of ethnic nationalism appear to be moderating, as not even the return to power of Bosnia’s main nationalist parties in the 2002 national elections has slowed the state-building momentum. Meanwhile, the country is edging closer towards the start of negotiations with the European Union on a Stabilization and Association Agreement. By the time Bosnia celebrates the 10th anniversary of the Dayton Peace Accords at the end of 2005, Europe’s powder keg may have become just another run-of-the-mill aspirant for EU membership. Despite this apparently good news, optimism about the future remains in short supply among Bosnians themselves. In one recent poll, fully 42 per cent of respondents agreed that the dominant trend in Bosnia is towards disintegration rather than integration, while a separate poll found a similar percentage ready to emigrate at the first opportunity. Voter turnout for the 2002 elections was dismal, and the results widely seen as a signal of popular discontent, if not outright disgust, with the political process. Thus, while Bosnia as a state appears to be doing better—at least in comparison with its near-death experience of the early 1990s—it is worth asking whether Bosnians themselves are benefiting from the advance of their country’s peace process. In other words, beyond the fact that Bosnians are no longer killing each other in large numbers—a far from insignificant accomplishment—where has the Dayton peace process left ordinary Bosnians, both as individuals and as members of the country’s major ethnic groups?","PeriodicalId":313717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14613190500036693","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

After nearly a decade of concerted international effort, Bosnia-Herzegovina appears finally to have been coerced and cajoled onto an irreversible path towards sustainable peace and eventual European integration. The past several years have seen repeated breakthroughs on Bosnia’s peacebuilding front: a million war-displaced persons have now at least partially reversed the results of ethnic cleansing by returning home, while the elements of a functional Bosnian state—including a single army, state customs and border services, and even a European-style value-added tax—are slowly falling into place. At the same time, the forces of ethnic nationalism appear to be moderating, as not even the return to power of Bosnia’s main nationalist parties in the 2002 national elections has slowed the state-building momentum. Meanwhile, the country is edging closer towards the start of negotiations with the European Union on a Stabilization and Association Agreement. By the time Bosnia celebrates the 10th anniversary of the Dayton Peace Accords at the end of 2005, Europe’s powder keg may have become just another run-of-the-mill aspirant for EU membership. Despite this apparently good news, optimism about the future remains in short supply among Bosnians themselves. In one recent poll, fully 42 per cent of respondents agreed that the dominant trend in Bosnia is towards disintegration rather than integration, while a separate poll found a similar percentage ready to emigrate at the first opportunity. Voter turnout for the 2002 elections was dismal, and the results widely seen as a signal of popular discontent, if not outright disgust, with the political process. Thus, while Bosnia as a state appears to be doing better—at least in comparison with its near-death experience of the early 1990s—it is worth asking whether Bosnians themselves are benefiting from the advance of their country’s peace process. In other words, beyond the fact that Bosnians are no longer killing each other in large numbers—a far from insignificant accomplishment—where has the Dayton peace process left ordinary Bosnians, both as individuals and as members of the country’s major ethnic groups?
两个城镇的故事:波斯尼亚-黑塞哥维那的人类安全和战后正常化的局限性
经过近十年的协调一致的国际努力,波斯尼亚-黑塞哥维那似乎终于被强迫和哄骗走上了通往可持续和平和最终欧洲一体化的不可逆转的道路。过去几年,波斯尼亚在建设和平方面取得了多次突破:一百万因战争而流离失所的人现在至少部分地通过返回家园扭转了种族清洗的结果,而一个正常运作的波斯尼亚国家的要素——包括单一军队、国家海关和边境服务,甚至是欧洲式的增值税——正在慢慢到位。与此同时,种族民族主义的力量似乎正在缓和,因为即使波斯尼亚主要民族主义政党在2002年全国选举中重新掌权,也没有减缓国家建设的势头。与此同时,该国正在与欧盟就《稳定与联合协议》开始谈判。到2005年底波斯尼亚庆祝《代顿和平协定》(Dayton Peace Accords)签署10周年时,欧洲的火药桶可能已经变成了又一个渴望加入欧盟的普通国家。尽管这是一个明显的好消息,但波斯尼亚人对未来的乐观情绪仍然不足。在最近的一次民意调查中,整整42%的答复者同意波斯尼亚的主要趋势是走向解体而不是一体化,而另一项民意调查发现,有类似比例的人一有机会就准备移民。2002年选举的投票率很低,选举结果被广泛视为民众对政治进程不满的信号,如果不是完全厌恶的话。因此,虽然波斯尼亚作为一个国家似乎做得更好——至少与20世纪90年代初的濒死经历相比——但值得一问的是,波斯尼亚人自己是否从国家和平进程的推进中受益。换句话说,除了波斯尼亚人不再大规模互相残杀这一事实之外——这是一项远非微不足道的成就——代顿和平进程把普通的波斯尼亚人(无论是作为个人还是作为该国主要种族群体的成员)留在了哪里?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信