Not a Mirror, but an Engine: Digital Methods for Contextual Analysis of “Social Big Data”

Jonas Andersson Schwarz
{"title":"Not a Mirror, but an Engine: Digital Methods for Contextual Analysis of “Social Big Data”","authors":"Jonas Andersson Schwarz","doi":"10.16993/BBK.B","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digital media infrastructures give rise to texts that are socially interconnected in various forms of complex networks. These mediated phenomena can be analyzed through methods that trace relational data. Social network analysis (SNA) traces interconnections between social nodes, while natural language processing (NLP) traces intralinguistic properties of the text. These methods can be bracketed under the header “social big data.” Empirical and theoretical rigor begs a constructionist understanding of such data. Analysis is inherently perspective-bound; it is rarely a purely objective statistical exercise. Some kind of selection is always made, primarily out of practical necessity. Moreover, the agents observed (network participants producing the texts in question) all tend to make their own encodings, based on observational inferences, situated in the network topology. Recent developments in such methods have, for example, provided social scientific scholars with innovative means to address inconsistencies in comparative surveys in different languages, addressing issues of comparability and measurement equivalence. NLP provides novel, inductive ways of understanding word meanings as a function of their relational placement in syntagmatic and paradigmatic relations, thereby identifying biases in the relative meanings of words. Reflecting on current research projects, the chapter addresses key epistemological challenges in order to improve contextual understanding.","PeriodicalId":332163,"journal":{"name":"Digital Human Sciences: New Objects – New Approaches","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Human Sciences: New Objects – New Approaches","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16993/BBK.B","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Digital media infrastructures give rise to texts that are socially interconnected in various forms of complex networks. These mediated phenomena can be analyzed through methods that trace relational data. Social network analysis (SNA) traces interconnections between social nodes, while natural language processing (NLP) traces intralinguistic properties of the text. These methods can be bracketed under the header “social big data.” Empirical and theoretical rigor begs a constructionist understanding of such data. Analysis is inherently perspective-bound; it is rarely a purely objective statistical exercise. Some kind of selection is always made, primarily out of practical necessity. Moreover, the agents observed (network participants producing the texts in question) all tend to make their own encodings, based on observational inferences, situated in the network topology. Recent developments in such methods have, for example, provided social scientific scholars with innovative means to address inconsistencies in comparative surveys in different languages, addressing issues of comparability and measurement equivalence. NLP provides novel, inductive ways of understanding word meanings as a function of their relational placement in syntagmatic and paradigmatic relations, thereby identifying biases in the relative meanings of words. Reflecting on current research projects, the chapter addresses key epistemological challenges in order to improve contextual understanding.
不是镜子,而是引擎:“社交大数据”语境分析的数字化方法
数字媒体基础设施产生了以各种形式的复杂网络在社会上相互联系的文本。这些中介现象可以通过跟踪关系数据的方法进行分析。社会网络分析(SNA)追踪社会节点之间的相互联系,而自然语言处理(NLP)追踪文本的语言内部属性。这些方法可以放在“社交大数据”的标题下。经验和理论的严谨性要求对这些数据有一个建构主义的理解。分析本质上是受视角限制的;它很少是纯粹客观的统计工作。人们总是做出某种选择,主要是出于实际需要。此外,观察到的代理(产生问题文本的网络参与者)都倾向于根据位于网络拓扑中的观察推断进行自己的编码。例如,这些方法的最新发展为社会科学学者提供了创新的手段,以解决不同语言比较调查中的不一致之处,解决可比性和计量等值问题。NLP提供了一种新颖的、归纳的方式来理解词义,作为它们在组合和聚合关系中的关系位置的功能,从而识别单词相对意义中的偏差。反映当前的研究项目,本章解决了关键的认识论挑战,以提高上下文理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信