Problematising development in sustainability: epistemic justice through an African ethic

S. Kumalo
{"title":"Problematising development in sustainability: epistemic justice through an African ethic","authors":"S. Kumalo","doi":"10.4314/SAJEE.V33I1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper critically engages with the concept of development through an analysis of epistemological justice in education for sustainable development (ESD) and presents alternative strategies for adaptation of the concept in the South. Many definitional challenges still surround development studies. The paper draws on the work of Wolfgang Sachs (1999) who asserts that the notion of sustainability has been consumed by development, presenting a view of sustainability which challenges the current and dominant economically driven hegemonic development discourse in which sustainability has become embedded. Further useful perspectives for this paper are offered by Amartya Sen (2001) who refers to development as a form of freedom. Sachs (1999) maintains that global definitions of development cement the dominant hegemonic discourse of the leading North, which has resulted in an obfuscation of the epistemological contribution from the South. The paper argues that, in the integration of congruent and enabling conceptual frameworks, allowing epistemic justice and validating the lived experience of learners through socially responsive pedagogical frameworks, South Africa is beginning to respond to the global environmental crisis. At the core of the paper is the question of whether an African ethical position advances the attainment of sustainability objectives. The paper concludes by positing a shift in scholastic and social understandings of development, and redefining the term from a changing terrain which may seem immutable with the current environmental crisis. Keywords: Epistemology, development, pedagogy, justice, African ethics","PeriodicalId":272843,"journal":{"name":"The Southern African Journal of Environmental Education","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Southern African Journal of Environmental Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/SAJEE.V33I1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This paper critically engages with the concept of development through an analysis of epistemological justice in education for sustainable development (ESD) and presents alternative strategies for adaptation of the concept in the South. Many definitional challenges still surround development studies. The paper draws on the work of Wolfgang Sachs (1999) who asserts that the notion of sustainability has been consumed by development, presenting a view of sustainability which challenges the current and dominant economically driven hegemonic development discourse in which sustainability has become embedded. Further useful perspectives for this paper are offered by Amartya Sen (2001) who refers to development as a form of freedom. Sachs (1999) maintains that global definitions of development cement the dominant hegemonic discourse of the leading North, which has resulted in an obfuscation of the epistemological contribution from the South. The paper argues that, in the integration of congruent and enabling conceptual frameworks, allowing epistemic justice and validating the lived experience of learners through socially responsive pedagogical frameworks, South Africa is beginning to respond to the global environmental crisis. At the core of the paper is the question of whether an African ethical position advances the attainment of sustainability objectives. The paper concludes by positing a shift in scholastic and social understandings of development, and redefining the term from a changing terrain which may seem immutable with the current environmental crisis. Keywords: Epistemology, development, pedagogy, justice, African ethics
可持续性发展问题化:通过非洲伦理认识正义
本文通过对可持续发展教育(ESD)认识论正义的分析,批判性地探讨了发展概念,并提出了在南方适应这一概念的替代策略。许多定义上的挑战仍然围绕着发展研究。本文利用沃尔夫冈(goldman Sachs)的工作(1999)声称可持续性的概念已经被发展,呈现一个视图的可持续性挑战当前占主导地位的经济驱动的霸权发展可持续性已经成为嵌入式的话语。Amartya Sen(2001)为本文提供了进一步有用的观点,他将发展称为自由的一种形式。Sachs(1999)认为,发展的全球定义巩固了发达国家的主导霸权话语,这导致了对发展中国家认识论贡献的混淆。本文认为,通过整合一致性和支持性概念框架,允许认知正义,并通过社会响应性教学框架验证学习者的生活经验,南非开始应对全球环境危机。本文的核心问题是非洲的道德立场是否促进了可持续发展目标的实现。论文最后提出了学术界和社会对发展的理解的转变,并从当前环境危机似乎不可改变的变化中重新定义了这个术语。关键词:认识论,发展,教育学,正义,非洲伦理
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信