Using Gossip Enabled Distributed Circuit Breaking for Improving Resiliency of Distributed Systems

Aashay Palliwar, Srinivas Pinisetty
{"title":"Using Gossip Enabled Distributed Circuit Breaking for Improving Resiliency of Distributed Systems","authors":"Aashay Palliwar, Srinivas Pinisetty","doi":"10.1109/ICSA53651.2022.00010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Distributed systems are rife with failures. Several resiliency patterns are used to improve the ability of these systems to tolerate faults and maintain functionality. The circuit breaker pattern is a popular resiliency pattern that is especially suitable for the case when the faults causing dependency failures take a variable amount of time to resolve. In this paper, we propose a modification to the traditional circuit breaker pattern. We also propose a gossip-based information dissemination protocol that enables the (modified) circuit breakers deployed on multiple client-service instances to take a concerted and more informed decision when a common dependency is facing persistent failures. We formally model the client-server systems that use traditional and the proposed distributed circuit breaker patterns in UPPAAL to analyze and compare their performance. The statistical model checking queries performed on the models show that, as compared to the traditional circuit breaker pattern, the distributed version results in fewer unsuccessful requests, that consume system/network resources, with practically the same total execution time under various availability conditions - only at the famously low cost of a robust gossip-based information dissemination protocol.","PeriodicalId":179123,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE 19th International Conference on Software Architecture (ICSA)","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE 19th International Conference on Software Architecture (ICSA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSA53651.2022.00010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Distributed systems are rife with failures. Several resiliency patterns are used to improve the ability of these systems to tolerate faults and maintain functionality. The circuit breaker pattern is a popular resiliency pattern that is especially suitable for the case when the faults causing dependency failures take a variable amount of time to resolve. In this paper, we propose a modification to the traditional circuit breaker pattern. We also propose a gossip-based information dissemination protocol that enables the (modified) circuit breakers deployed on multiple client-service instances to take a concerted and more informed decision when a common dependency is facing persistent failures. We formally model the client-server systems that use traditional and the proposed distributed circuit breaker patterns in UPPAAL to analyze and compare their performance. The statistical model checking queries performed on the models show that, as compared to the traditional circuit breaker pattern, the distributed version results in fewer unsuccessful requests, that consume system/network resources, with practically the same total execution time under various availability conditions - only at the famously low cost of a robust gossip-based information dissemination protocol.
利用八卦使能分布式断路提高分布式系统的弹性
分布式系统充满了故障。使用了几种弹性模式来提高这些系统容忍故障和维护功能的能力。断路器模式是一种流行的弹性模式,特别适用于导致依赖关系失败的错误需要花费可变的时间来解决的情况。本文提出了对传统断路器模式的一种改进。我们还提出了一个基于八卦的信息传播协议,该协议使部署在多个客户端服务实例上的(修改后的)断路器能够在公共依赖项面临持续故障时做出协调一致且更明智的决策。我们正式地对客户端-服务器系统建模,这些系统在UPPAAL中使用传统的和提议的分布式断路器模式,以分析和比较它们的性能。在模型上执行的统计模型检查查询显示,与传统的断路器模式相比,分布式版本导致更少的不成功请求,这些请求消耗系统/网络资源,在各种可用性条件下的总执行时间几乎相同-只是以健壮的基于八卦的信息传播协议的低成本而闻名。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信