Elisions of Cholera and Class in David Copperfield

Mary Kai Patterson
{"title":"Elisions of Cholera and Class in David Copperfield","authors":"Mary Kai Patterson","doi":"10.32473/ufjur.24.130690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines Charles Dickens’s novel David Copperfield (1850) in terms of cholera epidemics that dramatically shaped Victorian discourse on disease and responsibility. As a prominent public figure, Dickens participated in discussions of sanitation reform and legislation. However, he evaded specific discussion of disease within David Copperfield despite the novel’s publication amidst both the passing of the Public Health Act of 1848 and a second cholera outbreak in London. This article argues that Dickens presents disease as an “unspeakable subject” incommensurate with Victorian understandings of cleanliness, propriety, and maintaining the untouchability of the upper classes. Both Dickens and David cleanse all traces of disease to disavow a confrontation of equally uncomfortable subjects, predominately the class inequities and social determinants of health unearthed by the cholera epidemics. An analysis of two major characters demonstrate the unspoken presence of disease in the novel and a preserved prejudice against “filthy” lower-class people. ","PeriodicalId":278243,"journal":{"name":"UF Journal of Undergraduate Research","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UF Journal of Undergraduate Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32473/ufjur.24.130690","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines Charles Dickens’s novel David Copperfield (1850) in terms of cholera epidemics that dramatically shaped Victorian discourse on disease and responsibility. As a prominent public figure, Dickens participated in discussions of sanitation reform and legislation. However, he evaded specific discussion of disease within David Copperfield despite the novel’s publication amidst both the passing of the Public Health Act of 1848 and a second cholera outbreak in London. This article argues that Dickens presents disease as an “unspeakable subject” incommensurate with Victorian understandings of cleanliness, propriety, and maintaining the untouchability of the upper classes. Both Dickens and David cleanse all traces of disease to disavow a confrontation of equally uncomfortable subjects, predominately the class inequities and social determinants of health unearthed by the cholera epidemics. An analysis of two major characters demonstrate the unspoken presence of disease in the novel and a preserved prejudice against “filthy” lower-class people. 
《大卫·科波菲尔》中霍乱和阶级的省略
本研究从霍乱流行的角度考察了查尔斯·狄更斯的小说《大卫·科波菲尔》(1850),霍乱流行戏剧性地塑造了维多利亚时代关于疾病和责任的话语。作为一个杰出的公众人物,狄更斯参与了卫生改革和立法的讨论。然而,他回避了对大卫·科波菲尔疾病的具体讨论,尽管小说出版时正值1848年《公共卫生法》的通过和伦敦第二次霍乱爆发。这篇文章认为,狄更斯把疾病描绘成一个“无法言说的主题”,与维多利亚时代对清洁、礼仪和保持上层阶级不可接触性的理解不相称。狄更斯和大卫都清除了所有疾病的痕迹,否认了同样令人不安的主题的对抗,主要是阶级不平等和霍乱流行所揭示的健康的社会决定因素。对两个主要人物的分析表明,小说中存在着不言而喻的疾病,以及对“肮脏的”下层阶级的偏见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信