Tiempo y relato en los testimonios de activistas del movimiento de DDHH en Argentina

R. Kotler
{"title":"Tiempo y relato en los testimonios de activistas del movimiento de DDHH en Argentina","authors":"R. Kotler","doi":"10.34096/HVM.N12.6238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Debates around Oral History have not ceased for the last years, in spite of having reached certain maturity in their methodological face. Some aspects which refer to professional ethics, to the truthfulness of testimonies, to the way in which oral history is produced and to the property of the historical accounts, still remain object of debate in every Oral History Convention. One of the issues which still needs to be deeply discussed is the time of the testimonies, as a result of the oral history interviews with the protagonists of recent history. Within the last problem referred to as a reflection on “history protagonists´ protagonism” when narrating their memories, we will be able to reconsider the significance of oral testimony as it makes the social actor return to a vivid past which is related to the present of the interview. When it comes to interviewing human rights movements´activists, we can think of a triple protagonism of the social actors, placing them in a permanent position which covers both past and present: 1) That initial protagonism of political activism which begins in the hard years of the last civic-military dictatorship or during the transition to democracy with the search for their disappeared relatives. 2. That protagonism they achieve one more time when they narrate their life experience during the oral history interviews, where building up the historical accounts can only be carried out by those who have experienced history and who have been their direct witnesses. 3. The participation as witnesses/claimants in the trials for crimes against humanity of the last years which, once again, turns Human Rights activists into main characters in a relevant historical deed. In this article, I thus aim at examining the temporal matter and the triple protagonism mentioned above, so as to contribute to the study field with new issues to think about when it comes to using that complex methodology proposed by oral history.","PeriodicalId":156794,"journal":{"name":"Historia, voces y memoria","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historia, voces y memoria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34096/HVM.N12.6238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Debates around Oral History have not ceased for the last years, in spite of having reached certain maturity in their methodological face. Some aspects which refer to professional ethics, to the truthfulness of testimonies, to the way in which oral history is produced and to the property of the historical accounts, still remain object of debate in every Oral History Convention. One of the issues which still needs to be deeply discussed is the time of the testimonies, as a result of the oral history interviews with the protagonists of recent history. Within the last problem referred to as a reflection on “history protagonists´ protagonism” when narrating their memories, we will be able to reconsider the significance of oral testimony as it makes the social actor return to a vivid past which is related to the present of the interview. When it comes to interviewing human rights movements´activists, we can think of a triple protagonism of the social actors, placing them in a permanent position which covers both past and present: 1) That initial protagonism of political activism which begins in the hard years of the last civic-military dictatorship or during the transition to democracy with the search for their disappeared relatives. 2. That protagonism they achieve one more time when they narrate their life experience during the oral history interviews, where building up the historical accounts can only be carried out by those who have experienced history and who have been their direct witnesses. 3. The participation as witnesses/claimants in the trials for crimes against humanity of the last years which, once again, turns Human Rights activists into main characters in a relevant historical deed. In this article, I thus aim at examining the temporal matter and the triple protagonism mentioned above, so as to contribute to the study field with new issues to think about when it comes to using that complex methodology proposed by oral history.
阿根廷人权运动积极分子证词中的时间和故事
关于口述历史的争论在过去的几年里并没有停止,尽管在方法论方面已经达到了一定的成熟。关于职业道德、证词的真实性、口述历史的产生方式以及历史记录的性质等方面的问题,在每一次口述历史会议中都仍然是争论的对象。其中一个仍然需要深入讨论的问题是证词的时间,这是对近代史上主要人物的口述历史采访的结果。在最后一个问题中,即在叙述他们的记忆时对“历史主角”的反思,我们将能够重新考虑口述证词的意义,因为它使社会行动者回归到与访谈的现在相关的生动的过去。在采访人权运动积极分子时,我们可以想到社会行动者的三重主角,将他们置于一个涵盖过去和现在的永久位置:1)政治激进主义的最初主角,始于最后一个文武独裁统治的艰难岁月或在向民主过渡期间寻找失踪亲属的过程。2. 当他们在口述历史采访中讲述自己的生活经历时,他们又一次实现了这种主角性,在口述历史采访中,只有那些经历过历史并成为他们直接证人的人才能建立历史叙述。3.作为证人/原告参加过去几年对危害人类罪的审判,这再次使人权活动分子成为有关历史行为的主要人物。因此,在本文中,我的目的是研究上述的时间问题和三重主角,以便在使用口述历史提出的复杂方法时,为研究领域提供新的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信