COVID-19 measurements at the workplace in various industries and company sizes: a 2-month follow-up cohort study of full-time employees in Japan

N. Sasaki, K. Imamura, M. Kataoka, R. Kuroda, K. Tsuno, Utako Sawada, H. Asaoka, M. Iida, N. Kawakami
{"title":"COVID-19 measurements at the workplace in various industries and company sizes: a 2-month follow-up cohort study of full-time employees in Japan","authors":"N. Sasaki, K. Imamura, M. Kataoka, R. Kuroda, K. Tsuno, Utako Sawada, H. Asaoka, M. Iida, N. Kawakami","doi":"10.1539/EOHP.2020-0017-OA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: This study aimed to investigate workplace measures implemented in response to COVID-19 during the outbreak in Japan from T1 (March 2020) to T2 (May 2020), focusing on the disparities by company size and industry. Methods: A longitudinal study was conducted using a cohort of full-time employees, starting with the baseline online survey on March 19–22, 2020 (T1). An online follow-up survey was conducted on May 22–26, 2020 (T2). The McNemar test was used to assess differences between T1 and T2 in the proportion of implemented measurements. Analysis of covariance was performed to compare the differences in the number of implemented measures across groups classified by company size or industry, adjusting for sex and age. Results: A total of 1,032 participants (response rate: 72.6%) completed the follow-up questionnaire. The final analytic sample comprised n=987. The workplace measures involving the delivery of information on COVID-19 were 88.4% at T2, which significantly increased from T1 (increased 8.6%, p <0.001). As well as the T1 survey, respondents in the smaller companies reported a significantly smaller number of measures, but the disparity compared to large companies became small. The same trend was observed in the type of industry. Conclusions: This study showed an improvement in the implementation of preventive measures in response to COVID-19 in the workplace in Japan through the first wave outbreak. The disparity between companies of different sizes and from different industries decreased at T2, suggesting that company groups that initially implemented fewer measures caught up.","PeriodicalId":278195,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Occupational Health Practice","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Occupational Health Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1539/EOHP.2020-0017-OA","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate workplace measures implemented in response to COVID-19 during the outbreak in Japan from T1 (March 2020) to T2 (May 2020), focusing on the disparities by company size and industry. Methods: A longitudinal study was conducted using a cohort of full-time employees, starting with the baseline online survey on March 19–22, 2020 (T1). An online follow-up survey was conducted on May 22–26, 2020 (T2). The McNemar test was used to assess differences between T1 and T2 in the proportion of implemented measurements. Analysis of covariance was performed to compare the differences in the number of implemented measures across groups classified by company size or industry, adjusting for sex and age. Results: A total of 1,032 participants (response rate: 72.6%) completed the follow-up questionnaire. The final analytic sample comprised n=987. The workplace measures involving the delivery of information on COVID-19 were 88.4% at T2, which significantly increased from T1 (increased 8.6%, p <0.001). As well as the T1 survey, respondents in the smaller companies reported a significantly smaller number of measures, but the disparity compared to large companies became small. The same trend was observed in the type of industry. Conclusions: This study showed an improvement in the implementation of preventive measures in response to COVID-19 in the workplace in Japan through the first wave outbreak. The disparity between companies of different sizes and from different industries decreased at T2, suggesting that company groups that initially implemented fewer measures caught up.
在不同行业和公司规模的工作场所测量COVID-19:一项针对日本全职员工的为期2个月的随访队列研究
目的:本研究旨在调查T1(2020年3月)至T2(2020年5月)日本疫情期间为应对COVID-19而实施的工作场所措施,重点关注公司规模和行业的差异。方法:从2020年3月19日至22日(T1)的基线在线调查开始,对全职员工进行纵向研究。2020年5月22日至26日(T2)进行了在线跟踪调查。McNemar检验用于评估T1和T2在实施测量比例上的差异。进行协方差分析以比较按公司规模或行业分类的各组间实施措施数量的差异,并对性别和年龄进行调整。结果:共有1032名参与者完成了随访问卷,应答率为72.6%。最终的分析样本包括n=987。T2时,涉及提供COVID-19信息的工作场所措施占88.4%,较T1显著增加(增加8.6%,p <0.001)。与T1调查一样,小公司的受访者报告的衡量指标数量明显较少,但与大公司相比,差距变小了。在工业类型中也观察到同样的趋势。结论:本研究表明,通过第一波疫情爆发,日本工作场所应对COVID-19的预防措施实施有所改善。不同规模和不同行业的公司之间的差距在T2时减小了,这表明最初实施较少措施的公司集团赶上了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信