{"title":"Practical State Machine Replication with Confidentiality","authors":"Sisi Duan, Haibin Zhang","doi":"10.1109/SRDS.2016.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We address the problem of how to store and process data privately in cloud environments that employ state machine replication. We show that the only known solution to the problem (Yin et al., SOSP '03) is potentially susceptible to attacks. We then present a new protocol that is secure in the stronger model we formalize. Our protocol uses only efficient symmetric cryptography, while Yin et al.'s uses costly threshold signatures. We implemented and evaluated our protocol. We show that our protocol is two to three orders of magnitude faster than Yin et al.'s, which is less secure than ours.","PeriodicalId":165721,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE 35th Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems (SRDS)","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE 35th Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems (SRDS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SRDS.2016.031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
Abstract
We address the problem of how to store and process data privately in cloud environments that employ state machine replication. We show that the only known solution to the problem (Yin et al., SOSP '03) is potentially susceptible to attacks. We then present a new protocol that is secure in the stronger model we formalize. Our protocol uses only efficient symmetric cryptography, while Yin et al.'s uses costly threshold signatures. We implemented and evaluated our protocol. We show that our protocol is two to three orders of magnitude faster than Yin et al.'s, which is less secure than ours.