{"title":"The Genesis of National Park Management: John Roberts White and Sequoia National Park, 1920–1947","authors":"Rick Hydrick","doi":"10.2307/4004773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"T he administrative principles of Stephen T. Mather, first director of the National Park Service, are the foundation for the park system's successes. Mather and his successors, Horace M. Albright and Arno B. Cammerer, believed with missionary zeal that expanding and opening the parks to the public through good roads, trails, and accommodations would not only save these scenic wonders but would convince the government and the public of their inestimable economic, patriotic, educational, recreational, and, later, environmental values. With the businesslike optimism of a marketing salesman, Mather declared that \"our national parks are practically lying fallow, and only await proper development to bring them into their own.\"1 Historians, having accepted the importance of Mather and his successors, have dealt mainly with the formulation of park policy at the national level. This approach has yielded important insights into the evolution of the \"national park idea\" but has left other questions unexplored. For instance, who were the so-called Mather men directing development in each of the parks? How did they translate the Mather tradition into individual park policies? And most important, how did the Mather tradition inspire and invigorate park development on a local level?2 Park historian William C. Everhart has drawn an analogy between the individual park superintendent and the","PeriodicalId":246151,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forest History","volume":"128 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forest History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/4004773","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
T he administrative principles of Stephen T. Mather, first director of the National Park Service, are the foundation for the park system's successes. Mather and his successors, Horace M. Albright and Arno B. Cammerer, believed with missionary zeal that expanding and opening the parks to the public through good roads, trails, and accommodations would not only save these scenic wonders but would convince the government and the public of their inestimable economic, patriotic, educational, recreational, and, later, environmental values. With the businesslike optimism of a marketing salesman, Mather declared that "our national parks are practically lying fallow, and only await proper development to bring them into their own."1 Historians, having accepted the importance of Mather and his successors, have dealt mainly with the formulation of park policy at the national level. This approach has yielded important insights into the evolution of the "national park idea" but has left other questions unexplored. For instance, who were the so-called Mather men directing development in each of the parks? How did they translate the Mather tradition into individual park policies? And most important, how did the Mather tradition inspire and invigorate park development on a local level?2 Park historian William C. Everhart has drawn an analogy between the individual park superintendent and the
国家公园管理局第一任局长斯蒂芬·T·马瑟(Stephen T. Mather)的管理原则是公园系统成功的基础。马瑟和他的继任者霍勒斯·m·奥尔布赖特(Horace M. Albright)和阿诺·b·卡默勒(Arno B. Cammerer)怀着传教士般的热情相信,通过良好的道路、步道和住宿设施,扩大公园并向公众开放,不仅能拯救这些风景秀丽的奇观,还能使政府和公众相信它们不可估量的经济、爱国、教育、娱乐以及后来的环境价值。马瑟以一种营销人员的务实乐观态度宣称:“我们的国家公园实际上处于休耕状态,只等待适当的开发,使它们成为自己的公园。”历史学家已经承认了马瑟及其继任者的重要性,他们主要研究的是国家层面上公园政策的制定。这种方法为“国家公园理念”的演变提供了重要的见解,但也留下了其他未探索的问题。例如,谁是所谓的“马瑟人”,指导每个公园的发展?他们是如何将马瑟传统转化为个别公园政策的?最重要的是,马瑟的传统是如何启发和激励当地公园发展的?公园历史学家威廉·c·埃弗哈特(William C. Everhart)在个别公园管理员和公园管理员之间作了类比