Family Presence During Invasive and Resuscitation Procedures: The Attitudes of Israeli Emergency Nurses

Daniela Kotkis, N. Tabak
{"title":"Family Presence During Invasive and Resuscitation Procedures: The Attitudes of Israeli Emergency Nurses","authors":"Daniela Kotkis, N. Tabak","doi":"10.2174/1874761200802010013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Whether to allow family presence or not is the subject of sharp controversy among health care professionals. The factors which the professional literature shows influence support for the idea are type of job, seniority, social pressure at the workplace, training, cultural background and the degree of invasiveness of the procedure. The re- searchers thought that emergency nurses' own attitudes on the issue of family presence, together with their own perceived behavioral control, and the susceptibility of these factors to peer and family pressure, could affect their wish and intent to encourage family presence. Methods: A structured self-completed questionnaire was distributed to a convenience sample of 80 emergency nurses. Pearson correlation coefficients and regression analysis were used to test the two hypotheses designed to verify the re- searchers' thinking. Results: Both hypotheses were confirmed. Discussion: Subjective factors operating in and on nurses' minds can practically affect the likelihood that they will pro- mote family presence in the resuscitation room. By postulating such new factors and relationships and objectively con- firming their relevance, the study has opened up new horizons for other researchers to investigate more deeply and pre-","PeriodicalId":352758,"journal":{"name":"The Open Ethics Journal","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Ethics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874761200802010013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Introduction: Whether to allow family presence or not is the subject of sharp controversy among health care professionals. The factors which the professional literature shows influence support for the idea are type of job, seniority, social pressure at the workplace, training, cultural background and the degree of invasiveness of the procedure. The re- searchers thought that emergency nurses' own attitudes on the issue of family presence, together with their own perceived behavioral control, and the susceptibility of these factors to peer and family pressure, could affect their wish and intent to encourage family presence. Methods: A structured self-completed questionnaire was distributed to a convenience sample of 80 emergency nurses. Pearson correlation coefficients and regression analysis were used to test the two hypotheses designed to verify the re- searchers' thinking. Results: Both hypotheses were confirmed. Discussion: Subjective factors operating in and on nurses' minds can practically affect the likelihood that they will pro- mote family presence in the resuscitation room. By postulating such new factors and relationships and objectively con- firming their relevance, the study has opened up new horizons for other researchers to investigate more deeply and pre-
侵入性和复苏过程中的家庭存在:以色列急救护士的态度
导言:是否允许家人在场是卫生保健专业人员之间激烈争议的主题。专业文献显示,影响支持这一想法的因素是工作类型、资历、工作场所的社会压力、培训、文化背景和程序的侵入性程度。研究人员认为,急诊护士自身对家属在场问题的态度、行为控制的感知以及这些因素对同伴和家庭压力的易感性可能会影响其鼓励家属在场的意愿和意图。方法:采用结构化自填问卷对80名急诊护士进行抽样调查。采用Pearson相关系数和回归分析对两个假设进行检验,以验证研究者的想法。结果:两个假设均得到证实。讨论:护士心中的主观因素实际上会影响他们在复苏室中促进家庭存在的可能性。通过对这些新的因素和关系的假设,并客观地证实了它们的相关性,本研究为其他研究者更深入、更准确地进行研究开辟了新的视野
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信