Towards a Democratic Singularity? Algorithmic Governmentality, the Eradication of Politics – And the Possibility of Resistance

J. Morison
{"title":"Towards a Democratic Singularity? Algorithmic Governmentality, the Eradication of Politics – And the Possibility of Resistance","authors":"J. Morison","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3662411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This contribution steps back from considering the operation of AI within the legal process directly and considers a more foundational issue surrounding democracy, and the basic legitimacy for any legal system that can be gained from a connection with ‘the will of the people’. The first section considers briefly how the promise of online consultation has not fully delivered on its democratic potential. The paper then considers new developments in surveillance, where almost all aspects of everyday life are transformed into quantified data, and subject to monitoring and predictive analysis. It is argued that this amounts to a new, pervasive and totalising form of surveillance and control which can be understood best as a form of ‘algorithmic governmentality’. Building upon arguments about consultation, it is contended that developments in technology may in future have the effect of making existing ideas about consultation and democracy redundant as actual preferences can be measured directly without the need for an intermediary political process to represent preferences. This direct presentation of preferences, created by inference from the radical datafication process, offers a false emancipation by appearing to be, by its very nature, all-inclusive and accurate. This is a novel form of governance, seemingly beyond traditional politics and it is one that has the potential to undermine, and then transcend, many of fundamental attributes of citizenship which presently appear as part of the bargain within the government – governed relationship. This contribution seeks to explore the parameters of this development of ‘algorithmic democracy’, and the potential of law and other strategies to operate as resistance.","PeriodicalId":443934,"journal":{"name":"Is Law Computable?","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Is Law Computable?","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3662411","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This contribution steps back from considering the operation of AI within the legal process directly and considers a more foundational issue surrounding democracy, and the basic legitimacy for any legal system that can be gained from a connection with ‘the will of the people’. The first section considers briefly how the promise of online consultation has not fully delivered on its democratic potential. The paper then considers new developments in surveillance, where almost all aspects of everyday life are transformed into quantified data, and subject to monitoring and predictive analysis. It is argued that this amounts to a new, pervasive and totalising form of surveillance and control which can be understood best as a form of ‘algorithmic governmentality’. Building upon arguments about consultation, it is contended that developments in technology may in future have the effect of making existing ideas about consultation and democracy redundant as actual preferences can be measured directly without the need for an intermediary political process to represent preferences. This direct presentation of preferences, created by inference from the radical datafication process, offers a false emancipation by appearing to be, by its very nature, all-inclusive and accurate. This is a novel form of governance, seemingly beyond traditional politics and it is one that has the potential to undermine, and then transcend, many of fundamental attributes of citizenship which presently appear as part of the bargain within the government – governed relationship. This contribution seeks to explore the parameters of this development of ‘algorithmic democracy’, and the potential of law and other strategies to operate as resistance.
走向民主奇点?算法治理,政治的根除——以及抵抗的可能性
这一贡献从直接考虑人工智能在法律程序中的运作,转而考虑围绕民主的更基本的问题,以及任何法律制度的基本合法性,这些法律制度可以从与“人民意志”的联系中获得。第一部分简要地考虑了在线咨询的前景如何没有充分发挥其民主潜力。然后,本文考虑了监测的新发展,日常生活的几乎所有方面都转化为量化数据,并受到监测和预测分析。有人认为,这相当于一种新的、普遍的、全面的监视和控制形式,可以最好地理解为一种“算法治理”形式。在关于协商的论点的基础上,有人认为,技术的发展将来可能会使现有的关于协商和民主的想法变得多余,因为实际的偏好可以直接衡量,而不需要中间的政治进程来代表偏好。从激进的数据化过程中推断出来的这种直接的偏好呈现,提供了一种虚假的解放,因为它的本质似乎是包罗万象和准确的。这是一种新颖的治理形式,似乎超越了传统政治,它有可能破坏,然后超越公民的许多基本属性,这些属性目前似乎是政府治理关系中交易的一部分。这篇文章试图探索“算法民主”发展的参数,以及法律和其他策略作为阻力运作的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信