Money and Society

R. Naismith
{"title":"Money and Society","authors":"R. Naismith","doi":"10.1163/9789004383098_009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In its most basic sense, money is a means of measuring and mediating value as understood by human society. It does not exist by nature, but by the imaginative impulse of those who need to engage in acts of exchange. For this reason diverse forms of money have taken shape throughout history across the globe (and continue to do so).1 Money, it might be said, is the creation of society, and especially of more complex societies marked by diverse interactions. But the length of and variety in this relationship mean that it has often come full circle: money has profoundly affected society, and not always in the ways one might expect. The traditional interpretation of the influence of money in modern society – which has in turn affected readings of other areas and periods – goes back to foundational figures in history and the social sciences such as Karl Marx, Georg Simmel, and Marcel Mauss, and holds that the rise of monetization in and of itself would erode more affective human bonds.2 But an important strand of recent scholarship developed by anthropologists and sociologists of the modern world has pruned back this narrative; instead, ways of incorporating money into social processes have come to the fore.3 Calculation and quantification are just one part of the story, and by no means always the dominant one, be it in the modern United States, Africa, Indonesia, or the Pacific Islands. The impact of money on any particular community depends on many more variables than the presence of money alone. The application of this approach to medieval Europe is the central goal of this chapter. How did medieval people actually view and use money, and what impact did it have on their society (and vice versa)? This is, of course, a vast topic. Coins, ingots, and other means of exchange only became money when they factored into valuation or exchange, in relation to abstracted units of account.","PeriodicalId":431800,"journal":{"name":"Money and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Money and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004383098_009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In its most basic sense, money is a means of measuring and mediating value as understood by human society. It does not exist by nature, but by the imaginative impulse of those who need to engage in acts of exchange. For this reason diverse forms of money have taken shape throughout history across the globe (and continue to do so).1 Money, it might be said, is the creation of society, and especially of more complex societies marked by diverse interactions. But the length of and variety in this relationship mean that it has often come full circle: money has profoundly affected society, and not always in the ways one might expect. The traditional interpretation of the influence of money in modern society – which has in turn affected readings of other areas and periods – goes back to foundational figures in history and the social sciences such as Karl Marx, Georg Simmel, and Marcel Mauss, and holds that the rise of monetization in and of itself would erode more affective human bonds.2 But an important strand of recent scholarship developed by anthropologists and sociologists of the modern world has pruned back this narrative; instead, ways of incorporating money into social processes have come to the fore.3 Calculation and quantification are just one part of the story, and by no means always the dominant one, be it in the modern United States, Africa, Indonesia, or the Pacific Islands. The impact of money on any particular community depends on many more variables than the presence of money alone. The application of this approach to medieval Europe is the central goal of this chapter. How did medieval people actually view and use money, and what impact did it have on their society (and vice versa)? This is, of course, a vast topic. Coins, ingots, and other means of exchange only became money when they factored into valuation or exchange, in relation to abstracted units of account.
金钱与社会
从最基本的意义上讲,货币是衡量和调节人类社会所理解的价值的手段。它不是天生存在的,而是那些需要参与交换行为的人的想象冲动所产生的。由于这个原因,全球历史上已经形成了多种形式的货币(并将继续如此)可以说,货币是社会的产物,尤其是以各种互动为特征的更为复杂的社会的产物。但这种关系的持续时间和多样性意味着,它经常是一个完整的循环:金钱深刻地影响着社会,但并不总是以人们可能期望的方式。金钱对现代社会的影响——反过来影响了对其他领域和时期的解读——的传统解读可以追溯到历史和社会科学的基础人物,如卡尔·马克思、乔治·齐美尔和马塞尔·莫斯,他们认为货币化的兴起本身会侵蚀更多的人类情感纽带但是,现代世界的人类学家和社会学家最近发展起来的一种重要的学术研究,对这种叙述进行了删减;相反,将金钱纳入社会进程的方法已经脱颖而出计算和量化只是故事的一部分,而且绝不总是占主导地位,无论是在现代的美国、非洲、印度尼西亚还是太平洋岛屿。货币对任何特定社区的影响取决于比货币本身存在更多的变量。这一方法在中世纪欧洲的应用是本章的中心目标。中世纪的人们是如何看待和使用金钱的,金钱对他们的社会有什么影响(反之亦然)?当然,这是一个广泛的话题。硬币、锭和其他交换手段只有在与抽象的记账单位相关的价值或交换中考虑到它们时才成为货币。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信