Bitcoin Conditional Volatility: GARCH Extensions and Markov Switching Approach

Miriam Sosa, E. Ortiz, Alejandra Cabello
{"title":"Bitcoin Conditional Volatility: GARCH Extensions and Markov Switching Approach","authors":"Miriam Sosa, E. Ortiz, Alejandra Cabello","doi":"10.1108/s1569-376720190000020020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One important characteristic of cryptocurrencies has been their high and erratic volatility. To represent this complicated behavior, recent studies have emphasized the use of autoregressive models frequently concluding that generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH) models are the most adequate to overcome the limitations of conventional standard deviation estimates. Some studies have expanded this approach including jumps into the modeling. Following this line of research, and extending previous research, our study analyzes the volatility of Bitcoin employing and comparing some symmetric and asymmetric GARCH model extensions (threshold ARCH (TARCH), exponential GARCH (EGARCH), asymmetric power ARCH (APARCH), component GARCH (CGARCH), and asymmetric component GARCH (ACGARCH)), under two distributions (normal and generalized error). Additionally, because linear GARCH models can produce biased results if the series exhibit structural changes, once the conditional volatility has been modeled, we identify the best fitting GARCH model applying a Markov switching model to test whether Bitcoin volatility evolves according to two different regimes: high volatility and low volatility. The period of study includes daily series from July 16, 2010 (the earliest date available) to January 24, 2019. Findings reveal that EGARCH model under generalized error distribution provides the best fit to model Bitcoin conditional volatility. According to the Markov switching autoregressive (MS-AR) Bitcoin’s conditional volatility displays two regimes: high volatility and low volatility.","PeriodicalId":287910,"journal":{"name":"Disruptive Innovation in Business and Finance in the Digital World","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disruptive Innovation in Business and Finance in the Digital World","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/s1569-376720190000020020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

One important characteristic of cryptocurrencies has been their high and erratic volatility. To represent this complicated behavior, recent studies have emphasized the use of autoregressive models frequently concluding that generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH) models are the most adequate to overcome the limitations of conventional standard deviation estimates. Some studies have expanded this approach including jumps into the modeling. Following this line of research, and extending previous research, our study analyzes the volatility of Bitcoin employing and comparing some symmetric and asymmetric GARCH model extensions (threshold ARCH (TARCH), exponential GARCH (EGARCH), asymmetric power ARCH (APARCH), component GARCH (CGARCH), and asymmetric component GARCH (ACGARCH)), under two distributions (normal and generalized error). Additionally, because linear GARCH models can produce biased results if the series exhibit structural changes, once the conditional volatility has been modeled, we identify the best fitting GARCH model applying a Markov switching model to test whether Bitcoin volatility evolves according to two different regimes: high volatility and low volatility. The period of study includes daily series from July 16, 2010 (the earliest date available) to January 24, 2019. Findings reveal that EGARCH model under generalized error distribution provides the best fit to model Bitcoin conditional volatility. According to the Markov switching autoregressive (MS-AR) Bitcoin’s conditional volatility displays two regimes: high volatility and low volatility.
比特币条件波动率:GARCH扩展和马尔可夫交换方法
加密货币的一个重要特征是其高且不稳定的波动性。为了描述这种复杂的行为,最近的研究强调使用自回归模型,经常得出结论,广义自回归条件异方差(GARCH)模型最足以克服传统标准差估计的局限性。一些研究扩展了这种方法,包括跳到模型中。在此基础上,本研究采用对称和非对称GARCH模型扩展(阈值GARCH (TARCH)、指数GARCH (EGARCH)、非对称功率GARCH (APARCH)、分量GARCH (CGARCH)和非对称分量GARCH (ACGARCH)),在两种分布(正态误差和广义误差)下分析了比特币的波动性。此外,如果序列表现出结构变化,由于线性GARCH模型可能会产生有偏差的结果,一旦对条件波动率进行建模,我们就会使用马尔可夫切换模型确定最适合的GARCH模型,以测试比特币波动率是否根据两种不同的制度发展:高波动率和低波动率。研究期间包括每日系列,从2010年7月16日(最早的日期)到2019年1月24日。研究结果表明,广义误差分布下的EGARCH模型对比特币条件波动的拟合效果最好。根据马尔可夫切换自回归(MS-AR),比特币的条件波动率表现出两种状态:高波动率和低波动率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信