Assessing think-pair-square in distributed modeling of use case diagrams

U. Erra, G. Scanniello
{"title":"Assessing think-pair-square in distributed modeling of use case diagrams","authors":"U. Erra, G. Scanniello","doi":"10.1109/EmpiRE.2011.6046249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we propose a new method for the modeling of use case diagrams in the context of global software development. It is based on think-pair-square, a widely used cooperative method for active problem solving. The validity of the developed technology (i.e., the method and its supporting environment) has been assessed through two controlled experiments. In particular, the experiments have been conducted to compare the developed technology with a brainstorming session based on face-to-face interaction. The comparison has been performed with respect to the time needed to model use case diagrams and the quality of the produced models. The data analysis indicates a significant difference in favor of the brainstorming session for the time, with no significant impact on the requirements specification.","PeriodicalId":128168,"journal":{"name":"Workshop on Empirical Requirements Engineering (EmpiRE 2011)","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Workshop on Empirical Requirements Engineering (EmpiRE 2011)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EmpiRE.2011.6046249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a new method for the modeling of use case diagrams in the context of global software development. It is based on think-pair-square, a widely used cooperative method for active problem solving. The validity of the developed technology (i.e., the method and its supporting environment) has been assessed through two controlled experiments. In particular, the experiments have been conducted to compare the developed technology with a brainstorming session based on face-to-face interaction. The comparison has been performed with respect to the time needed to model use case diagrams and the quality of the produced models. The data analysis indicates a significant difference in favor of the brainstorming session for the time, with no significant impact on the requirements specification.
评估用例图的分布式建模中的think-pair-square
在本文中,我们提出了一种在全局软件开发环境下对用例图建模的新方法。它基于思维对方,一种广泛使用的主动解决问题的合作方法。通过两个对照实验对所开发的技术(即方法及其支持环境)的有效性进行了评估。特别值得一提的是,这些实验是为了将已开发的技术与基于面对面互动的头脑风暴会议进行比较。对用例图建模所需的时间和所生成模型的质量进行了比较。数据分析表明,在赞成头脑风暴会议的情况下,对需求规范没有显著的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信