The English Judicial Trends in Lifting the Corporate Veil

Farqaleet Khokhar
{"title":"The English Judicial Trends in Lifting the Corporate Veil","authors":"Farqaleet Khokhar","doi":"10.56830/ozvw4086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The “separate legal personality” and “limited liability” are two main and fundamental principles of corporate law. The concept of a separate legal personality of the company originated from the case Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd. The landmark case decided that when a company is registered, it attains a separate legal identity. A corporate veil is a concept that recognizes the separate corporate personality of the company from the shareholders‟ personalities. In many circumstances, it happens that the corporate personality of the company commits fraud or any other illegal acts. It becomes impossible to believe that an artificial personality like a company commits any illegal act or fraud. In such cases, for the identification of the original wrongdoer, the veil of the corporation is pierced which is also called lifting the corporate veil. To highlight the English Courts’ trends in lifting the corporate veil, this article unearths the canons of English courts’ judgments to pinpoint the inconsistencies in their decisions. The paper inspects the exceptions to the Saloman rule that have been focused on and meticulously analysed in this research paper to highlight the evolution of these recognised exceptions including “Single Economic Entity, Fraud, and Facade, Sake of justice, and Agency.”","PeriodicalId":328962,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Accounting and Management Sciences","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Accounting and Management Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56830/ozvw4086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The “separate legal personality” and “limited liability” are two main and fundamental principles of corporate law. The concept of a separate legal personality of the company originated from the case Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd. The landmark case decided that when a company is registered, it attains a separate legal identity. A corporate veil is a concept that recognizes the separate corporate personality of the company from the shareholders‟ personalities. In many circumstances, it happens that the corporate personality of the company commits fraud or any other illegal acts. It becomes impossible to believe that an artificial personality like a company commits any illegal act or fraud. In such cases, for the identification of the original wrongdoer, the veil of the corporation is pierced which is also called lifting the corporate veil. To highlight the English Courts’ trends in lifting the corporate veil, this article unearths the canons of English courts’ judgments to pinpoint the inconsistencies in their decisions. The paper inspects the exceptions to the Saloman rule that have been focused on and meticulously analysed in this research paper to highlight the evolution of these recognised exceptions including “Single Economic Entity, Fraud, and Facade, Sake of justice, and Agency.”
揭开公司面纱的英国司法趋势
“法人独立”和“有限责任”是公司法的两大基本原则。公司独立法人的概念起源于所罗门诉所罗门有限公司一案。这一具有里程碑意义的案件决定,当一家公司注册时,它就获得了一个独立的法律身份。公司面纱是一种概念,它将公司的法人人格与股东的人格区分开来。在很多情况下,公司法人人格存在欺诈或其他违法行为。很难相信像公司这样的人工人格会有任何非法行为或欺诈行为。在这种情况下,为了识别最初的违法者,公司的面纱被穿透,也被称为解除公司面纱。为了突出英国法院揭开公司面纱的趋势,本文揭示了英国法院判决的经典,以找出其判决中的不一致之处。本文考察了Saloman规则的例外情况,这些例外情况在本文中得到了关注和细致的分析,以突出这些公认的例外情况的演变,包括“单一经济实体、欺诈和表象、正义和代理”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信