Bosiljka Đikanović, T. Kouwenhoven-Pasmooij, R. Kraaijenhagen, Van Roeters, A. Burdorf, V. Vasilev, S. Robroek
{"title":"Gender differences at the workplace: Sickness absence and productivity loss at work and their association with health and work-related factors","authors":"Bosiljka Đikanović, T. Kouwenhoven-Pasmooij, R. Kraaijenhagen, Van Roeters, A. Burdorf, V. Vasilev, S. Robroek","doi":"10.5937/smclk4-43005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Differences in sickness absence and productivity loss at work between men and women are recognized but need to be better understood. Materials and methods: In a cross-sectional study, 10,407 employees from 37 companies in the Netherlands participated in a Web-based health risk assessment, between 2010 and 2014. Self-reported short-term (<9 days) and long-term (10 or more days) sickness absences during the preceding 12 months were assessed. The questionnaire also asked about productivity loss at work, physical and psychosocial work-related factors, and health problems. Log-linear models were used to estimate prevalence ratios (PR), with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Women, more often than men, experienced short-term and long-term sickness absence (PR 1.06, 95% CI 1.01 - 1.11, and PR 1.33, 95% CI 1.21 - 1.46, respectively) but were less likely to have productivity loss at work (more than 30%), (PR 0.90, 95% CI 0.81 - 0.99). In short-term sickness absence, gender differences were reduced by 20%, after controlling for psychosocial work-related factors, and by 60%, after controlling for health problems, separately. None of the factors mentioned above could explain a large productivity loss at work among men. Conclusions: Higher prevalence of sickness absence among women can partly be explained by psychosocial work-related factors and health problems. Further studies are needed to explore large productivity loss at work among men.","PeriodicalId":286220,"journal":{"name":"Srpski medicinski casopis Lekarske komore","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Srpski medicinski casopis Lekarske komore","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/smclk4-43005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Introduction: Differences in sickness absence and productivity loss at work between men and women are recognized but need to be better understood. Materials and methods: In a cross-sectional study, 10,407 employees from 37 companies in the Netherlands participated in a Web-based health risk assessment, between 2010 and 2014. Self-reported short-term (<9 days) and long-term (10 or more days) sickness absences during the preceding 12 months were assessed. The questionnaire also asked about productivity loss at work, physical and psychosocial work-related factors, and health problems. Log-linear models were used to estimate prevalence ratios (PR), with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Women, more often than men, experienced short-term and long-term sickness absence (PR 1.06, 95% CI 1.01 - 1.11, and PR 1.33, 95% CI 1.21 - 1.46, respectively) but were less likely to have productivity loss at work (more than 30%), (PR 0.90, 95% CI 0.81 - 0.99). In short-term sickness absence, gender differences were reduced by 20%, after controlling for psychosocial work-related factors, and by 60%, after controlling for health problems, separately. None of the factors mentioned above could explain a large productivity loss at work among men. Conclusions: Higher prevalence of sickness absence among women can partly be explained by psychosocial work-related factors and health problems. Further studies are needed to explore large productivity loss at work among men.
导言:男女在因病缺勤和丧失工作效率方面的差异已得到承认,但需要更好地了解。材料和方法:在一项横断面研究中,来自荷兰37家公司的10,407名员工在2010年至2014年期间参加了一项基于网络的健康风险评估。自我报告的短期(<9天)和长期(10天或以上)病假在过去12个月进行评估。调查问卷还询问了工作效率下降、与工作有关的生理和心理因素以及健康问题。采用对数线性模型估计患病率(PR),置信区间为95%。结果:女性比男性更常经历短期和长期病假(分别为1.06,95% CI 1.01 - 1.11和1.33,95% CI 1.21 - 1.46),但在工作中生产力损失的可能性较小(超过30%)(PR 0.90, 95% CI 0.81 - 0.99)。在短期病假中,在控制了与工作相关的社会心理因素后,性别差异减少了20%,在单独控制了健康问题后,性别差异减少了60%。以上提到的任何一个因素都不能解释男性工作效率的大幅下降。结论:妇女缺勤率较高的部分原因是与工作有关的社会心理因素和健康问题。需要进一步的研究来探索男性在工作中生产力的巨大损失。