Evaluating legal literacy programmes - aims, challenges, models and a call to action

Richard Grimes
{"title":"Evaluating legal literacy programmes - aims, challenges, models and a call to action","authors":"Richard Grimes","doi":"10.19164/IJPLE.V2I1.706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Generally speaking, if one asks most people whether improving public understanding of the law and legal system is a good thing, most hands will go up. This is perhaps no surprise. An improved level of legal literacy should not only raise awareness of rights and responsibilities but may well provide people with more of an informed choice about what to do if they encounter legal issues. It might give those concerned the tools and confidence to address some of these problems themselves through self-help and it may address, at least to some degree, inequalities that otherwise exist. Overall, improving levels of legal literacy could enhance access to justice more generally. The generic term often ascribed to raising legal awareness amongst the wider population is public legal education (PLE).There is a wealth of anecdotal material suggesting that all of the above is highly relevant and impactful but there is little by way of clear empirical evidence to substantiate such claims.  This article will look at the need for, and means of, developing such an evidence base and ends with a plea for more research, sharing of ideas and collaboration in terms of evaluating PLE.","PeriodicalId":332351,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Public Legal Education","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Public Legal Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19164/IJPLE.V2I1.706","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Generally speaking, if one asks most people whether improving public understanding of the law and legal system is a good thing, most hands will go up. This is perhaps no surprise. An improved level of legal literacy should not only raise awareness of rights and responsibilities but may well provide people with more of an informed choice about what to do if they encounter legal issues. It might give those concerned the tools and confidence to address some of these problems themselves through self-help and it may address, at least to some degree, inequalities that otherwise exist. Overall, improving levels of legal literacy could enhance access to justice more generally. The generic term often ascribed to raising legal awareness amongst the wider population is public legal education (PLE).There is a wealth of anecdotal material suggesting that all of the above is highly relevant and impactful but there is little by way of clear empirical evidence to substantiate such claims.  This article will look at the need for, and means of, developing such an evidence base and ends with a plea for more research, sharing of ideas and collaboration in terms of evaluating PLE.
评估法律扫盲项目——目标、挑战、模式和行动呼吁
一般来说,如果有人问大多数人,提高公众对法律和法律制度的了解是否一件好事,大多数人都会举手。这也许不足为奇。提高法律知识水平不仅应该提高对权利和责任的认识,而且很可能为人们在遇到法律问题时提供更多的知情选择。它可能会给那些关心的人提供工具和信心,通过自助来解决其中的一些问题,它可能会解决,至少在某种程度上,否则存在的不平等。总的来说,提高法律知识水平可以更普遍地增加诉诸司法的机会。在更广泛的人群中提高法律意识的通用术语是公共法律教育(PLE)。有大量的轶事材料表明,上述所有内容都是高度相关和有影响力的,但几乎没有明确的经验证据来证实这些说法。本文将探讨开发这样一个证据基础的必要性和方法,最后呼吁在评估PLE方面进行更多的研究、分享想法和合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信