Offering stat 102: social statistics for decision makers

M. Schield
{"title":"Offering stat 102: social statistics for decision makers","authors":"M. Schield","doi":"10.52041/srap.16605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Statistical educators should support offering three introductory statistics courses: STAT 100 (Statistical Literacy for non-quantitative majors), STAT 101 (Traditional inferential statistics) and STAT 102 (Social statistics for decision makers). The support for the STAT 102 claim includes the needs of most students taking introductory statistics, the different kinds of decisions being made, the growing importance of big data, the limited amount of free time in the current STAT 101 course, the 2016 update to the GAISE guidelines, the importance of confounding in influencing statistical associations and the ability of confounding to influence statistical significance. This paper provides student-tested ways of showing and explaining confounding, statistical significance and the influence of confounding on statistical significance. Indeed 100% of the IASE respondents agreed that students should be shown how confounding can influence statistical significance, 84% agreed that failure to illustrate this confounder-significance connection constituted \"professional negligence\" and 69% agreed that statistical educators should support offering STAT 102 along with STAT 100 and STAT 101. In a separate survey of the Augsburg students taking this STAT 102 type course, 61% agreed or strongly agreed that a STAT 102 course should be required by all students for graduation. With most of these statistical educators supporting the existence of a STAT 102 course and most Augsburg students seeing significant value in such a course, the door is now open for a new generation of courses, textbooks and teachers.","PeriodicalId":165958,"journal":{"name":"Promoting Understanding of Statistics about Society IASE Roundtable Conference","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Promoting Understanding of Statistics about Society IASE Roundtable Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52041/srap.16605","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Statistical educators should support offering three introductory statistics courses: STAT 100 (Statistical Literacy for non-quantitative majors), STAT 101 (Traditional inferential statistics) and STAT 102 (Social statistics for decision makers). The support for the STAT 102 claim includes the needs of most students taking introductory statistics, the different kinds of decisions being made, the growing importance of big data, the limited amount of free time in the current STAT 101 course, the 2016 update to the GAISE guidelines, the importance of confounding in influencing statistical associations and the ability of confounding to influence statistical significance. This paper provides student-tested ways of showing and explaining confounding, statistical significance and the influence of confounding on statistical significance. Indeed 100% of the IASE respondents agreed that students should be shown how confounding can influence statistical significance, 84% agreed that failure to illustrate this confounder-significance connection constituted "professional negligence" and 69% agreed that statistical educators should support offering STAT 102 along with STAT 100 and STAT 101. In a separate survey of the Augsburg students taking this STAT 102 type course, 61% agreed or strongly agreed that a STAT 102 course should be required by all students for graduation. With most of these statistical educators supporting the existence of a STAT 102 course and most Augsburg students seeing significant value in such a course, the door is now open for a new generation of courses, textbooks and teachers.
提供统计102:社会统计决策者
统计教育工作者应该支持开设三门统计入门课程:STAT 100(非定量专业的统计素养),STAT 101(传统推论统计)和STAT 102(决策者的社会统计)。支持STAT 102说法的理由包括:大多数学习统计学入门课程的学生的需求、正在做出的不同类型的决策、大数据日益增长的重要性、当前STAT 101课程的空闲时间有限、2016年GAISE指南的更新、混淆在影响统计关联方面的重要性以及混淆影响统计显著性的能力。本文提供了显示和解释混杂、统计显著性以及混杂对统计显著性的影响的学生测试方法。事实上,100%的IASE受访者同意,应该向学生展示混淆是如何影响统计显著性的,84%的人同意,未能说明这种混淆-显著性联系构成了“专业疏忽”,69%的人同意统计教育者应该支持提供STAT 102以及STAT 100和STAT 101。在对奥格斯堡学生进行的另一项调查中,61%的学生同意或强烈同意,所有学生毕业时都应该修一门STAT 102课程。大多数统计教育工作者都支持STAT 102课程的存在,大多数奥格斯堡学生也看到了这样一门课程的重要价值,现在新一代的课程、教科书和教师的大门已经打开。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信