The path for the institutionalization of CIM in urban management and planning: a systematic literature review

A. P. Pereira, Mario Procopiuck
{"title":"The path for the institutionalization of CIM in urban management and planning: a systematic literature review","authors":"A. P. Pereira, Mario Procopiuck","doi":"10.3895/rbpd.v11n1.14586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Managing the urban space is a challenge with increasing complexity, among other reasons, because of the advances of information and communication technologies. The treatment of information technologies as human artifacts carrying social meanings is not new, and it has been occurring naturally in studies on Geographic Information System (GIS), Building Information Modeling (BIM). Between these two technologies, the concept of City Information Modeling (CIM) emerges from the adjustment of scale and semantics. The proficiency of institutional theory in understanding the political behavior of cities and evaluating from broad political processes to particular organizational processes of innovation is also not new. We aim to identify and examine publications on the adoption and implementation of BIM and GIS that use institutional theory to support their methods, discussions, and conclusions, intending to confront explanations of political and technological behavior in the implementation of these two tools that allow obtaining basic knowledge for implement CIM systems. Results show that external isomorphic pressures have received significant attention, overshadowing institutional theory's potential to look at issues from the perception of locally situated individuals. The conclusion is that institutional studies for implementing GIS and BIM can contribute to methodological and analytical frameworks for advances in CIM.","PeriodicalId":413989,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Planejamento e Desenvolvimento","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Planejamento e Desenvolvimento","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3895/rbpd.v11n1.14586","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Managing the urban space is a challenge with increasing complexity, among other reasons, because of the advances of information and communication technologies. The treatment of information technologies as human artifacts carrying social meanings is not new, and it has been occurring naturally in studies on Geographic Information System (GIS), Building Information Modeling (BIM). Between these two technologies, the concept of City Information Modeling (CIM) emerges from the adjustment of scale and semantics. The proficiency of institutional theory in understanding the political behavior of cities and evaluating from broad political processes to particular organizational processes of innovation is also not new. We aim to identify and examine publications on the adoption and implementation of BIM and GIS that use institutional theory to support their methods, discussions, and conclusions, intending to confront explanations of political and technological behavior in the implementation of these two tools that allow obtaining basic knowledge for implement CIM systems. Results show that external isomorphic pressures have received significant attention, overshadowing institutional theory's potential to look at issues from the perception of locally situated individuals. The conclusion is that institutional studies for implementing GIS and BIM can contribute to methodological and analytical frameworks for advances in CIM.
城市管理和规划中CIM制度化的路径:系统的文献综述
除其他原因外,由于信息和通信技术的进步,管理城市空间是一项日益复杂的挑战。将信息技术视为具有社会意义的人工制品并不是什么新鲜事,在地理信息系统(GIS)、建筑信息模型(BIM)的研究中已经自然而然地出现了。在这两种技术之间,从尺度和语义的调整中产生了城市信息模型(CIM)的概念。制度理论在理解城市政治行为和评估从广泛的政治过程到特定的组织过程的创新方面的熟练程度也并不新鲜。我们的目标是识别和检查关于采用和实施BIM和GIS的出版物,这些出版物使用制度理论来支持他们的方法、讨论和结论,旨在面对在实施这两种工具时的政治和技术行为的解释,从而获得实施CIM系统的基本知识。结果表明,外部同构压力受到了极大的关注,掩盖了制度理论从当地个人的感知来看问题的潜力。结论是,实施GIS和BIM的制度研究可以为CIM的进步提供方法和分析框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信