The Rise of Self-Determination Versus the Rise of Democracy

Cécile Vandewoude
{"title":"The Rise of Self-Determination Versus the Rise of Democracy","authors":"Cécile Vandewoude","doi":"10.3249/1868-1581-2-3-VANDEWOUD","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article challenges the traditional conception that the right to self-determination does not require a certain outcome. This article examines what restrictions international law imposes on peoples‟ choice to freely determine their political status. This article concludes that the right to self-determination calls for the installment of a form of government which is based on the consent of the governed, is substantially representative of all distinct groups in the country and respects human rights. Regardless of these duties imposed on governments one may only conclude from State practice that it is not observed by many States. As such the rise of self-determination may not automatically be equated to the rise of democracy.","PeriodicalId":360658,"journal":{"name":"Goettingen Journal of International Law","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Goettingen Journal of International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3249/1868-1581-2-3-VANDEWOUD","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This article challenges the traditional conception that the right to self-determination does not require a certain outcome. This article examines what restrictions international law imposes on peoples‟ choice to freely determine their political status. This article concludes that the right to self-determination calls for the installment of a form of government which is based on the consent of the governed, is substantially representative of all distinct groups in the country and respects human rights. Regardless of these duties imposed on governments one may only conclude from State practice that it is not observed by many States. As such the rise of self-determination may not automatically be equated to the rise of democracy.
自决的兴起与民主的兴起
这一条款挑战了自决权不需要某种结果的传统观念。本文探讨国际法对人民自由决定其政治地位的选择施加了哪些限制。该条的结论是,自决权要求建立一种以被统治者同意为基础的政府形式,这种政府在很大程度上代表了该国所有不同群体,并尊重人权。不管这些强加给政府的义务是什么,人们只能从国家实践中得出结论,许多国家没有遵守这些义务。因此,自决的兴起未必自动等同于民主的兴起。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信