The Omission of Islam

Jon Stewart
{"title":"The Omission of Islam","authors":"Jon Stewart","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192842930.003.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the great mysteries about Hegel’s Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion is why he does not dedicate a special analysis to Islam in the same way that he does to the other religions. This chapter examines this question along with Hegel’s general understanding of Islam. According to Hegel, the basic conception of the divine in Islam is the unitary God. Given this, it is understandable that he is at pains to distinguish Islam conceptually from the two other great monotheistic religions: Judaism and Christianity. In contrast to Jehovah of Judaism, Allah is an inclusive, universal God who has a relation to all human beings not just a specific group. In contrast to Christianity, Islam with its insistence on the unity of the divine, radically rejects the empirical realm of particularity. God is what is infinite, absolute, and true, whereas the mundane world is transitory, corrupt, and of no ultimate value. The key difference between Christianity and Islam, according to Hegel, lies in the fact that the former recognizes the validity of the particular, without this impinging on or compromising the universal; specifically, through the person of Christ, the truth of the particular is accorded its due. Nevertheless Islam has an important role to play in the development of history, according to Hegel’s understanding.","PeriodicalId":321408,"journal":{"name":"An Introduction to Hegel's Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion","volume":"115 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"An Introduction to Hegel's Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192842930.003.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the great mysteries about Hegel’s Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion is why he does not dedicate a special analysis to Islam in the same way that he does to the other religions. This chapter examines this question along with Hegel’s general understanding of Islam. According to Hegel, the basic conception of the divine in Islam is the unitary God. Given this, it is understandable that he is at pains to distinguish Islam conceptually from the two other great monotheistic religions: Judaism and Christianity. In contrast to Jehovah of Judaism, Allah is an inclusive, universal God who has a relation to all human beings not just a specific group. In contrast to Christianity, Islam with its insistence on the unity of the divine, radically rejects the empirical realm of particularity. God is what is infinite, absolute, and true, whereas the mundane world is transitory, corrupt, and of no ultimate value. The key difference between Christianity and Islam, according to Hegel, lies in the fact that the former recognizes the validity of the particular, without this impinging on or compromising the universal; specifically, through the person of Christ, the truth of the particular is accorded its due. Nevertheless Islam has an important role to play in the development of history, according to Hegel’s understanding.
伊斯兰教的遗漏
关于黑格尔的《宗教哲学讲座》最大的谜团之一是,为什么他没有像分析其他宗教一样,专门分析伊斯兰教。这一章考察了这个问题以及黑格尔对伊斯兰教的一般理解。黑格尔认为,伊斯兰教中神的基本概念是独一的神。有鉴于此,他煞费苦心地在概念上把伊斯兰教与另外两大一神论宗教——犹太教和基督教——区分开来,这是可以理解的。与犹太教的耶和华相反,安拉是一个包容的、普遍的上帝,他与所有人都有关系,而不仅仅是一个特定的群体。与基督教相反,伊斯兰教坚持神的统一性,从根本上拒绝了经验的特殊性领域。上帝是无限的,绝对的,真实的,而世俗世界是短暂的,腐败的,没有终极价值。黑格尔认为,基督教与伊斯兰教的主要区别在于,前者承认特殊事物的有效性,但不与普遍事物相抵触或妥协;具体地说,借着基督的位格,特殊的真理被赋予了应有的地位。然而,根据黑格尔的理解,伊斯兰教在历史发展中扮演着重要的角色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信