The legibility of the bowels: Lichtenberg’s excretory vision of Hogarth’s A Harlot’s Progress

A. Mahler
{"title":"The legibility of the bowels: Lichtenberg’s excretory vision of Hogarth’s A Harlot’s Progress","authors":"A. Mahler","doi":"10.7228/manchester/9781526127051.003.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay lays bare the rampant but thinly veiled scatology in Georg Christoph Lichtenberg’s renowned commentaries of William Hogarth’s A Harlot’s Progress. It shows that Lichtenberg finds all kinds of scatological objects – chamber pots, enemas, anal swabs – in Hogarth’s prints by applying what he calls the hermeneutics of hypochondria. Such a hermeneutics follows digressions, metaphorical associations, and metonymical connections to identify scatological objects in the images even where there are none. The resulting excremental vision of A Harlot’s Progress evidences, in Lichtenberg’s view, his own hypochondria and threatens the validity of his interpretations. But he also turns the scatological motif against the interpretive excess that produced it: excrement confronts the hypochondriacal interpreter with his own corporeal mortality and thus with the limits of his interpretive capacities as a human. Scatological satire therefore serves, in Lichtenberg’s conception, as something like a cynic self-therapy for interpretive hubris.","PeriodicalId":257444,"journal":{"name":"Bellies, bowels and entrails in the eighteenth century","volume":"109 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bellies, bowels and entrails in the eighteenth century","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7228/manchester/9781526127051.003.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay lays bare the rampant but thinly veiled scatology in Georg Christoph Lichtenberg’s renowned commentaries of William Hogarth’s A Harlot’s Progress. It shows that Lichtenberg finds all kinds of scatological objects – chamber pots, enemas, anal swabs – in Hogarth’s prints by applying what he calls the hermeneutics of hypochondria. Such a hermeneutics follows digressions, metaphorical associations, and metonymical connections to identify scatological objects in the images even where there are none. The resulting excremental vision of A Harlot’s Progress evidences, in Lichtenberg’s view, his own hypochondria and threatens the validity of his interpretations. But he also turns the scatological motif against the interpretive excess that produced it: excrement confronts the hypochondriacal interpreter with his own corporeal mortality and thus with the limits of his interpretive capacities as a human. Scatological satire therefore serves, in Lichtenberg’s conception, as something like a cynic self-therapy for interpretive hubris.
肠的易读性:利希滕伯格对贺加斯的《妓女的历程》的排泄视觉
这篇文章揭露了乔治·克里斯托夫·利希滕贝格对威廉·霍加斯的《妓女的进步》的著名评论中猖獗但几乎不加掩饰的淫秽言论。它表明,利希滕伯格通过运用他所谓的疑病症解释学,在霍加斯的版画中发现了各种各样的粪便物品——便壶、灌肠剂、肛门拭子。这样的解释学遵循离题、隐喻关联和转喻联系来识别图像中的粪便对象,即使没有。在利希滕贝格看来,《妓女的进步》所产生的排泄物证明了他自己的疑病症,并威胁到他的解释的有效性。但他也把粪便学的主题与产生它的解释过剩对立起来:粪便面对着疑病症的解释者,面对着他自己的肉体死亡,因此面对着他作为一个人的解释能力的限制。因此,在利希滕贝格的概念中,粪便讽刺就像是一种愤世嫉俗的自我疗法,用来治疗解释性的傲慢。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信