Incoherence in the Text of Q: An Investigation on Q Discourse Markers and Boundaries

Guy Josia Ndombo
{"title":"Incoherence in the Text of Q: An Investigation on Q Discourse Markers and Boundaries","authors":"Guy Josia Ndombo","doi":"10.56893/pajot.2022-v1i1.206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"      In critical scholarship, Q, a compilation of verses from Luke and Matthew, is considered to be the earliest document of the gospels. This article assesses the notion of such a document by analyzing its coherence. This is done through the study of discourse markers and boundaries of the Greek text of the Critical Edition of Q with the aim to detect possible areas of incoherence. This study continues the debate on the reality of Q since arguing for Q presupposes the existence of a coherent text. After presenting the nature, characteristics, extent, and problems of Q, an analysis of the information structure of Q was conducted. The study shows that there is coherence in the lower levels of discourse while there is some level of incoherence at higher levels. While such a finding in itself is not an explanation for the non-existence of Q, it is an indicator that the redactors of the Q text constructed a text that is not fully coherent.","PeriodicalId":357088,"journal":{"name":"Pan-African Journal of Theology","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pan-African Journal of Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56893/pajot.2022-v1i1.206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

      In critical scholarship, Q, a compilation of verses from Luke and Matthew, is considered to be the earliest document of the gospels. This article assesses the notion of such a document by analyzing its coherence. This is done through the study of discourse markers and boundaries of the Greek text of the Critical Edition of Q with the aim to detect possible areas of incoherence. This study continues the debate on the reality of Q since arguing for Q presupposes the existence of a coherent text. After presenting the nature, characteristics, extent, and problems of Q, an analysis of the information structure of Q was conducted. The study shows that there is coherence in the lower levels of discourse while there is some level of incoherence at higher levels. While such a finding in itself is not an explanation for the non-existence of Q, it is an indicator that the redactors of the Q text constructed a text that is not fully coherent.
Q语篇中的不连贯:对Q语篇标记与边界的考察
在学术评论中,《Q》被认为是最早的福音书,它收录了路加福音和马太福音的经文。本文通过分析其连贯性来评估这种文件的概念。这是通过对《批评版Q》希腊文本的话语标记和边界的研究来完成的,目的是发现可能的不连贯区域。这项研究继续了关于Q的真实性的争论,因为争论Q的前提是一个连贯的文本的存在。在介绍了Q的性质、特征、范围和问题之后,对Q的信息结构进行了分析。研究表明,低层次语篇存在连贯,而高层次语篇存在一定程度的不连贯。虽然这样的发现本身并不能解释Q的不存在,但它表明Q文本的编纂者构建了一个不完全连贯的文本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信