WONDER WOMAN (2017): AN AMBIGUOUS SYMBOL OF FEMINISM

Marinda P. D. Ghaisani
{"title":"WONDER WOMAN (2017): AN AMBIGUOUS SYMBOL OF FEMINISM","authors":"Marinda P. D. Ghaisani","doi":"10.22146/rubikon.v6i1.61486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wonder Woman is a popular fictional character who promotes the idea of an independent and powerful woman. Her name is glorified as she is assumed that she changes to the idea of the world being solely led and dominated by men. A remake film released in 2017 brings this popular character back into the silver screen. Despite being highly anticipated, not everyone supports Wonder Woman as an ideal symbol for women’s empowerment as dreamed by the feminists. Instead, the perception directed to Wonder Woman is divided into two lenses. One side believes that Wonder Woman is in line with the idea of feminism. In contrast, the other believes that she is the ideal example of a character who conforms to the standard set by patriarchal ideology.In investigating this idea, this paper applies Kate Millett’s concept of “personal is political” and how men and women’s roles in society have been passed down to the younger generation. The discussion illustrates that patriarchal power has infiltrated the character of Wonder Woman. Therefore, Wonder Woman becomes an ambiguous symbol when used for the women empowerment movement.Keywords: ambiguous; feminism; film; patriarchal power; Wonder Woman","PeriodicalId":269997,"journal":{"name":"Rubikon : Journal of Transnational American Studies","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rubikon : Journal of Transnational American Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22146/rubikon.v6i1.61486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wonder Woman is a popular fictional character who promotes the idea of an independent and powerful woman. Her name is glorified as she is assumed that she changes to the idea of the world being solely led and dominated by men. A remake film released in 2017 brings this popular character back into the silver screen. Despite being highly anticipated, not everyone supports Wonder Woman as an ideal symbol for women’s empowerment as dreamed by the feminists. Instead, the perception directed to Wonder Woman is divided into two lenses. One side believes that Wonder Woman is in line with the idea of feminism. In contrast, the other believes that she is the ideal example of a character who conforms to the standard set by patriarchal ideology.In investigating this idea, this paper applies Kate Millett’s concept of “personal is political” and how men and women’s roles in society have been passed down to the younger generation. The discussion illustrates that patriarchal power has infiltrated the character of Wonder Woman. Therefore, Wonder Woman becomes an ambiguous symbol when used for the women empowerment movement.Keywords: ambiguous; feminism; film; patriarchal power; Wonder Woman
神奇女侠(2017):一个模棱两可的女权主义象征
神奇女侠是一个很受欢迎的虚构人物,她宣扬了一个独立而强大的女性的理念。她的名字被美化了,因为她被认为改变了世界完全由男人领导和统治的想法。2017年上映的翻拍电影将这个受欢迎的角色带回了银幕。尽管备受期待,但并不是每个人都支持神奇女侠作为女权主义者梦想的女性赋权的理想象征。相反,人们对神奇女侠的看法被分为两种视角。一方认为神奇女侠符合女权主义的理念。相反,另一个人则认为她是符合男权意识形态所设定的标准的人物的理想榜样。在研究这一观点时,本文运用Kate Millett的“个人就是政治”的概念,以及男性和女性在社会中的角色是如何传递给年轻一代的。讨论表明,父权已经渗透到神奇女侠的性格中。因此,当神奇女侠被用于女性赋权运动时,就成为了一个模棱两可的象征。关键词:模糊;女权主义;电影;父权权力;神奇女侠
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信